FDA-cleared profile
Mirada Medical Ltd.
Workflow Box is a software system for routing DICOM-compliant data to and from automated processing components. It supports atlas-based contouring, deformable-image-registration re-contouring, and machine-learning contouring for CT, MR, and RTSTRUCT data; contours may be used in clinical workflows including radiation-therapy treatment planning. Appropriate software must review and edit generated contours, and Workflow Box is not intended to automatically detect lesions.
Clinical fit
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Public materials reviewed for this exact release do not establish the complete security posture. Request data-flow, identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote-access, vulnerability-management, backup, and incident-response evidence.
This is buyer-facing monitoring guidance derived from the exact cleared scope; it is not a claim that the FDA package provides a live monitoring service.
Map installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, outputs, and enabled functions to K181572 before acceptance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared or authorized release includes them.
The exact public deployment topology remains incomplete; establish hosting responsibility, data flow, availability, upgrade, service, and downtime boundaries locally.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04FDA-described topology does not establish current hosting contracts, security controls, uptime, or local qualification.
The exact public integration contract remains incomplete; establish and test supported input, output, identity, routing, archive, and downtime behavior locally.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally.
Use a signed local test set for the supported population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. Generated contours must be reviewed and edited with appropriate software by trained medical professionals; the exact indication excludes automatic lesion detection.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.
Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04No exact-product price or reimbursement determination was promoted.
Monitor K181572 by exact hardware, software, model, and algorithm version; patient population; anatomy; protocol; operator; input quality; output edits or overrides; failed studies; repeat acquisition or rework; downstream impact; downtime; incidents; recalls; and updates. Track these product-specific limits: Generated contours must be reviewed and edited with appropriate software by trained medical professionals; the exact indication excludes automatic lesion detection.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Sensitivity is not promoted as a product-wide endpoint. Compare only an exact endpoint, threshold, population, version, study design, and source if separately verified.
Specificity is not promoted as a product-wide endpoint. Compare only an exact endpoint, threshold, population, version, study design, and source if separately verified.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
FDA decision evidence and product verification described in the exact submission or PMA decision record. · CT, MR, and RTSTRUCT imaging data for automated contours and radiotherapy planning
exact submission · Tested version: Workflow Box configuration described in K181572 · Sponsor or vendor studyK181572
FDA decision material is manufacturer-submitted regulatory evidence. It is not independent clinical validation unless the exact source expressly establishes that distinction; local technical, clinical, privacy, security, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.
Economics and lifecycle
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public list price for the exact cleared or authorized configuration was found. Obtain a written quote separating license or hardware basis, implementation, interfaces, infrastructure, training, service, upgrades, renewal, consumables, and exit costs.
No exact-product reimbursement determination was promoted in this timeboxed review. Verify payer, site-of-service, coding, coverage, and local payment assumptions independently.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Exact-identifier review does not prove absence of all product-family safety signals.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Recovered from the prior exact-submission extraction and normalized under the current provenance rules. Scope was limited to exact FDA decision material and exact-submission recall disposition already present in the checked snapshot. Optional literature, vendor, pricing, and deployment research was not promoted. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, fda decision material, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources
Sources accessed through 2026-09-04.
Alternatives
Aitewan Biomedical Technology, Inc.
DeepBT Detector-Plus provides initial gross-tumor-volume contours on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and optional T2-weighted MR images for radiation-treatment planning in adults...
MIM Software Inc.
Contour ProtégéAI+ automatically creates contours on CT and T2 MR DICOM images as an accessory to MIM software for quantitative analysis, adaptive therapy, transfer, and archive;...
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc
AI-Rad Companion Organs RT VA40 automatically contours predefined structures from adult DICOM CT for qualified review and DICOM RTSTRUCT transfer; this release added 29...
MVision AI
MVision AI Segmentation automatically generates initial contours from CT images for radiotherapy planning; the contours are transferred for professional visualization, review,...