Radiology AI Directory

FDA-cleared profile

Contour ProtégéAI+

MIM Software Inc.

Authorized purpose: Contour ProtégéAI+ automatically creates contours on CT and T2 MR DICOM images as an accessory to MIM software for quantitative analysis, adaptive therapy, transfer, and archive; users must review and edit contours, and the device is not intended to detect or contour lesions.

Radiotherapy planningProstate imagingDetection and CADeQuantification and segmentation
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.

Product overview

Start with the essentials

Authorized purpose: Contour ProtégéAI+ automatically creates contours on CT and T2 MR DICOM images as an accessory to MIM software for quantitative analysis, adaptive therapy, transfer, and archive; users must review and edit contours, and the device is not intended to detect or contour lesions.

Overview status: Source-reviewed overview

Clinical takeaway

Clinical role: Contour ProtégéAI+ automatically creates contours on CT and T2 MR DICOM images as an accessory to MIM software for quantitative analysis, adaptive therapy, transfer, and archive; users must review and edit contours, and the device is not intended to detect or contour lesions.

Evidence takeaway

Evidence from the reviewed source record: The exact FDA 510(k) decision material establishes the submission identity, labeled use, inputs, population, and configuration boundary summarized here. No product-wide clinical-performance or outcome claim is promoted without an exact endpoint and version linkage.

Clinical details

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
Contour ProtégéAI+ automatically creates contours on CT and T2 MR DICOM images as an accessory to MIM software for quantitative analysis, adaptive therapy, transfer, and archive; users must review and edit contours, and the device is not intended to detect or contour lesions.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Intended users
Qualified radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Care setting and population
Radiation-oncology departments using compatible planning, imaging, and treatment-delivery systems.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Workflow role
Radiotherapy contouring, treatment planning, image registration, or treatment-session support under professional review.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Required input
Supported CT or MR images, structures, prescriptions, plans, registrations, and treatment-session data.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Output and human action
Contours, treatment plans, registrations, dose or evaluation results, and planning datasets requiring review and approval.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Limitations
Generated or modified contours and plans require qualified review, editing when needed, independent checks, and final approval before treatment.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K250035
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Anatomy
CT anatomical regions; prostate, seminal vesicles, and urethra on T2 MR
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Clearance type
510(k)
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2025-02-03
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
Standards-based DICOM/PACS integration was identified in the FDA submission materials; compatibility with a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, or orchestrator requires confirmation.
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-13

Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.

Deployment and data flow
Hybrid
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-13

Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.

Security and privacy
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

Public materials reviewed for this exact release do not establish the complete security posture. Request data-flow, identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote-access, vulnerability-management, backup, and incident-response evidence.

Training and support
Only qualified radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists should operate or interpret the product. Local onboarding should cover the exact release, supported population, limitations, failure examples, escalation, downtime, and competency documentation.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Monitoring and change control
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

The exact FDA decision and checked recall snapshot do not establish a complete local postmarket monitoring protocol. Track version, population, anatomy, protocol, input quality, edits, failures, repeats, downstream effects, downtime, incidents, recalls, and updates locally.

Release and scope verification

Map the installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, outputs, and enabled functions to K250035 before acceptance.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared release includes them.

Source

Interoperability acceptance

Exact public integration details remain incomplete; establish and test the supported input, output, identity, routing, archive, report, and downtime contract locally.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally.

Source

Clinical acceptance

Use a signed local test set for the exact labeled population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. Generated or modified contours and plans require qualified review, editing when needed, independent checks, and final approval before treatment.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.

Source

Economic evaluation

Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.

product family · checked 2026-09-04

No exact-product price was found in reviewed public material; productivity or value claims require local evidence.

Source

Lifecycle monitoring

Monitor by exact hardware, software, model, and algorithm version; patient population; anatomy; protocol; operator; input quality; output edits or overrides; failed studies; repeat acquisition or rework; downstream impact; downtime; incidents; recalls; and updates.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes. No exact native-submission recall record was found in the checked snapshot; this does not exclude other product-family or later signals.

SourceSource

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.

Evidence summary
The exact FDA 510(k) decision material establishes the submission identity, labeled use, inputs, population, and configuration boundary summarized here. No product-wide clinical-performance or outcome claim is promoted without an exact endpoint and version linkage.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04
Reported sensitivity
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

No exact submission-linked sensitivity endpoint with a verified population, threshold, tested version, and source was promoted.

Reported specificity
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

No exact submission-linked specificity endpoint with a verified population, threshold, tested version, and source was promoted.

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

K250035 FDA evidence package for Contour ProtégéAI+

  • DesignFDA 510(k) decision evidence package reviewed for exact submission identity and labeled scope
  • PopulationLabeled population and configuration described in the K250035 FDA decision material
  • Scopeexact submission
  • Tested versionContour ProtégéAI+ configuration described in K250035
  • IndependenceSponsor or vendor study

K250035

Manufacturer evidence submitted for the exact FDA decision. It is not independent clinical validation, and local technical, clinical, privacy, security, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.

Source

Costs and setup

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

No public list price for the exact cleared configuration was found. Obtain a written quote separating license or hardware basis, implementation, interfaces, infrastructure, training, service, upgrades, renewal, consumables, and exit costs.

Reimbursement and coding
No separate named-product Medicare payment was identified in the reviewed CMS radiation-oncology material. Evaluate net planning or delivery value within the radiotherapy service line.
  • Public source
  • Not applicable
  • Checked 2026-09-04

No product-specific code

No separate named-product payment identified in reviewed public material

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · United States

Build a local total-cost and value model; do not infer reimbursement from FDA clearance or approval.

Source

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
The 2026-09-02 openFDA device-recall snapshot contained no record matched to K250035 by exact native submission identifier. This does not exclude product-family, later, or adverse-event information.
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-04

Exact-identifier review does not prove absence of all product-family safety signals.

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
27Fields reviewed
12Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, fda decision material, peer reviewed literature, clinical trial registry, reimbursement policy, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources & history

How this profile was documented

Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.

View source ledger and history

Source ledger

  1. FDA 510(k) decision material K250035: Contour ProtégéAI+

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Published 2025-02-03 - Accessed 2026-09-04

    Scope: identity, purpose, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, intendedUsers, careSetting, workflowRole, input, output, limitations, evidenceSummary

  2. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-08-31

    Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext

  3. PubMed biomedical literature index

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery

  4. ClinicalTrials.gov study registry

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus

  5. openFDA Device Recall API

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-09-02

    Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching

  6. Radiation Oncology Model

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services - Accessed 2026-09-02

    Scope: reimbursement, radiationTherapyPaymentContext

Research history

  1. K250035 FDA decision

    Regulatory record

    510(k)

  2. Source-review record updated

    Research record

    fda record reviewed

  3. Reader overview source-reviewed

    Editorial review

    Source-reviewed editorial overlay

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K213976

Contour ProtégéAI

MIM Software Inc.

Contour ProtégéAI creates machine-learning contours from CT and MR DICOM images to support quantitative analysis, adaptive therapy, radiotherapy planning, archiving, and...

Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
Normal structures in labeled CT locations; prostate, seminal vesicles, and urethra on T2 MR
Decision
2022-02-03
Radiotherapy planningProstate imagingDetection and CADe
FDA-cleared K231765

Contour ProtégéAI

MIM Software Inc.

Contour ProtegeAI assists trained medical professionals with automated processing of CT and MR images, creates machine-learning contours for quantitative analysis, adaptive...

Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
CT anatomic locations and the prostate, seminal vesicles, and urethra on T2-weighted MR
Decision
2023-11-08
Radiotherapy planningProstate imagingQuantification and segmentation
FDA-cleared K223774

Contour ProtégéAI

MIM Software Inc.

Contour ProtegeAI assists trained medical professionals with automated processing of CT and MR images, machine-learning contour creation for quantitative analysis, adaptive...

Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
CT anatomic locations and the prostate, seminal vesicles, and urethra on T2-weighted MR
Decision
2023-04-06
Radiotherapy planningProstate imagingQuantification and segmentation
FDA-cleared K212915

MVision AI Segmentation

MVision AI

MVision AI Segmentation automatically generates initial contours from CT images for radiotherapy planning; the contours are transferred for professional visualization, review,...

Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
Head and neck, brain, breast, lung and abdomen, male pelvis, and female pelvis structures
Decision
2022-05-03
Breast imagingRadiotherapy planningOncology quantification