Supported acquisition environment
Supported hardware: Unspecified. Scanner manufacturers: Unspecified
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.
FDA-cleared profile
CorTechs Labs, Inc
Authorized purpose: NeuroQuant is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images.
Product overview
Authorized purpose: NeuroQuant is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
Clinical role: NeuroQuant is intended for automatic labeling, visualization and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images.
Evidence from the reviewed source record: NeuroQuant performance was evaluated by comparing segmentation accuracy with expert manual segmentations and by measuring segmentation reproducibility between same subject scans. The system yields reproducible results that are well correlated with computer-aided expert manual segmentations.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Patient-population text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; institutional setting may still require vendor confirmation.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
The exact packet supports DICOM MR-series output, color overlays, and morphometric reports, not the current secondary-capture or encapsulated-PDF wording.
The exact safety comparison states this review requirement; the current exclusion and unspecified-hardware wording is not in the packet.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Supported hardware: Unspecified. Scanner manufacturers: Unspecified
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for NeuroQuant; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-08Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
This replaces the non-FDA study-type/reference-standard label with the exact FDA performance-testing statement.
This field has not been curated yet.
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K170981
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public price or quote for the exact K170981 configuration was established in this review.
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains 20 PubMed and 5 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Discovery metadata alone does not establish exact tested-product, version, population, and endpoint applicability, so all candidates remain quarantined and none was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 20 PubMed and 5 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, fda decision summary packet, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation, purpose, intendedUsers, input, output, limitations, evidenceSummary
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, careSetting, output, limitations, evidenceSummary, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: postmarketSafety
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
fda record reviewed
Editorial review
Source-reviewed editorial overlay
Alternatives
Imeka Solutions, Inc.
ANDI 2.2 processes brain MR images for atlas-assisted visualization, segmentation and volumetric quantification, presenting adjunctive DICOM-readable information for trained...
BeauBrain Healthcare, Inc.
Morph automatically labels, visualizes, and volumetrically quantifies segmentable brain structures from MR images and may compare measurements with reference percentile data; it...
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Brain MRI morphometry and white matter hyperintensity quantification, including normative comparison and longitudinal change assessment for clinician review.
Imeka Solutions, Inc.
Adjunctive quantitative brain MRI analysis that compares patient measures with normative and longitudinal references; a physician reviews all results and makes the clinical...