Authorized purpose: Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize suspected breast-cancer lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize suspected breast-cancer lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize suspected breast-cancer lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: Mammography/DBT Anatomy or clinical context: Breast Input: Screening female-population DBT exams from compatible DBT systems.
Who uses it?Intended users: Physicians interpreting screening mammograms.
What does the software produce?Output: Lesion type, location, lesion-level/case-level abnormality score, and outlines/markings of regions suspected for breast cancer.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: Not a replacement for complete interpreting-physician review or clinical judgment; intended for screening mammography of the female population and compatible DBT systems.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize suspected breast-cancer lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA K231470 reports standalone testing on 2,202 DBT exams (1,100 negative/benign and 1,102 cancer) from US imaging facilities using Hologic and GE equipment. Standalone AUROC was 0.928 (95% CI 0.917-0.939; p < 0.0001). The 258-exam MRMC study with 15 MQSA-qualified/US board-certified radiologists compared patient-level LOS AUROC: CAD-assisted 0.915 (0.874-0.955) versus unassisted 0.897 (0.858-0.936), difference 0.017 (0.000-0.034), p = 0.0498.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize suspected breast-cancer lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems.
Not a replacement for complete interpreting-physician review or clinical judgment; intended for screening mammography of the female population and compatible DBT systems.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Standards-based DICOM/PACS integration was identified in the FDA submission materials; compatibility with a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, or orchestrator requires confirmation.
Public source
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-08-13
Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
ACR exact-submission catalog context
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for Lunit INSIGHT DBT; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA K231470 reports standalone testing on 2,202 DBT exams (1,100 negative/benign and 1,102 cancer) from US imaging facilities using Hologic and GE equipment. Standalone AUROC was 0.928 (95% CI 0.917-0.939; p < 0.0001). The 258-exam MRMC study with 15 MQSA-qualified/US board-certified radiologists compared patient-level LOS AUROC: CAD-assisted 0.915 (0.874-0.955) versus unassisted 0.897 (0.858-0.936), difference 0.017 (0.000-0.034), p = 0.0498.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Lunit INSIGHT DBT regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-alone performance and reader study (ACR AI Central category)
PopulationPopulation described in the exact-submission ACR model card
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K231470
Samplen=2202
IndependenceIndependence not established
K231470
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K231470 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K231470. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K231470 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
1Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 1 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate record. Discovery metadata alone does not establish exact tested-product, version, population, and endpoint applicability, so all candidates remain quarantined and none was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 1 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...
Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize breast-cancer-suspicious lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems, marking soft-tissue...
Genius AI Detection 2.0 analyzes compatible digital breast tomosynthesis exams to identify and mark soft-tissue densities (masses, architectural distortions, asymmetries) and...