FDA-cleared profile

Saige-Dx

DeepHealth, Inc.

Concurrent detection and characterization support for screening DBT mammography

Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.

Clinical fit

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
Concurrent detection and characterization support for screening DBT mammography
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Intended users
Interpreting physicians qualified to read screening mammography
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Care setting and population
Adult women undergoing screening mammography
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Workflow role
Concurrent detection, localization and diagnostic support
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Required input
DICOM DBT image stacks and associated FFDM and/or synthetic 2D images from compatible Hologic, GE and Siemens systems; prior-exam processing evaluated for Hologic and GE
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Output and human action
Finding bounding boxes, Finding Suspicion Level and Case Suspicion Level; DICOM Structured Report for markings and DICOM Secondary Capture summary report
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Limitations
Adjunct concurrent interpretation only; physician review remains required. Siemens compatibility and prior-exam processing have distinct validation cohorts and must not be assumed interchangeable across acquisition systems.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K253825
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
Mammography/DBT
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Anatomy
Breast
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Clearance type
510(k)
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2026-06-15
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
DICOM input and SR/SC output to the calling imaging workflow
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Local display of markings and prior retrieval require compatibility testing; this note is site acceptance guidance.

Deployment and data flow
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Exact hosting topology, hardware requirements and contracted PACS integration were not established.

Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

No scoped dated attestation for the Saige-Dx deployment was reviewed.

Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Site training, suspicion-score interpretation curriculum and competency assessment remain unestablished.

Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Post-deployment false-positive/false-negative auditing and update-specific acceptance requirements remain to be confirmed.

Vendor product-family identity

DeepHealth identifies SmartMammo Dx as also known as Saige DX within the multi-component SmartMammo offering

product family · checked 2026-09-06

The 2024 announcement predates K253825; other SmartMammo components and later rebranded products are not automatically capabilities of this submission.

Reading-aid output

DICOM SR markings and SC summary report

exact submission · checked 2026-09-05

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.

Evidence summary
Two retrospective blinded standalone studies: 2,425 DBT cases (509 Siemens, 514 GE, 1,402 Hologic) and 684 current/prior patients from Hologic and GE. The summary reports successful noninferiority endpoints without usable sensitivity/specificity point estimates.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Reported sensitivity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Submission summary describes noninferiority but does not report a usable exact-version sensitivity estimate with operating point.

Reported specificity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Exact-version specificity point estimate and operating point were not established in the reviewed summary.

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

K253825 acquisition-system standalone validation

Retrospective blinded standalone noninferiority evaluation · 509 Siemens, 514 GE and 1,402 Hologic DBT cases

exact submission · Tested version: Saige-Dx in K253825; release number not established · n=2425 · Independence not established

K253825

K253825 prior-exam processing validation

Retrospective blinded standalone evaluation · Current/prior examinations from Hologic and GE

exact submission · Tested version: Saige-Dx prior processing in K253825 · n=684 · Independence not established

K253825

Do not add this cohort to the acquisition-system cohort as unique patients without overlap information.

Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening: A Modeling Study

Microsimulation using published screening performance and cost assumptions · Simulated average-risk women screened biennially with DBT at ages 40-74

product family · Tested version: Saige-Dx family performance from earlier evidence; not K253825 testing · Independence not established

PMID:40983310 · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2025.09.005

Modeled lifetime outcomes are not observed clinical outcomes. Economic estimates do not establish a current license price or payer coverage.

Economics and lifecycle

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06

A published family economic model references a consumer screening add-on charge. This does not establish K253825 procurement cost, a current quote or a software-only price.

Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

No applicable payer policy was reviewed; cost-effectiveness modeling is not reimbursement evidence.

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Human reviewedStatus
2026-09-06Last searched
18Fields reviewed
11Source classes checked
1Reviewed PubMed leads
0Reviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

Stored PubMed candidate reviewed and retained as contextual family economic modeling; no exact-version outcomes or payer coverage promoted. Stored clinical-trial candidate array is empty. The current discovery snapshot contains 1 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.

Source classes: fda ai list, acr ai central product, fda decision summary, vendor product page, literature index, peer reviewed publication, trial registry, recall database, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources

Source ledger

Sources accessed through 2026-09-06.

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K260320

Lunit INSIGHT MMG (v1.1.10)

Lunit, Inc.

Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...

Modality
Mammography/DBT
Anatomy
Breast
Decision
2026-04-23
FDA-cleared K253796

Lunit INSIGHT DBT (V1.2)

Lunit, Inc.

FDA product code QDQ identifies this device class as Radiological Computer Assisted Detection/Diagnosis Software For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer. A radiological computer...

Modality
Mammography/DBT
Anatomy
Breast
Decision
2026-03-26
FDA-authorized DEN240047

Allix5

Clairity, Inc.

Allix5 generates a five-year breast-cancer-risk prediction from bilateral screening mammograms for eligible patients without known breast cancer at presentation; it is not...

Modality
Mammography/DBT
Anatomy
Breast
Decision
2025-05-30
FDA-cleared K242652

Lunit INSIGHT DBT v1.1

Lunit Inc.

FDA product code QDQ identifies this device class as Radiological Computer Assisted Detection/Diagnosis Software For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer. A radiological computer...

Modality
Mammography/DBT
Anatomy
Breast
Decision
2024-10-04