Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Adjunctive estimation of the BI-RADS 5th Edition breast-density category from processed digital 2D mammograms to aid radiologists; not diagnostic.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Processed digital 2D mammograms from FFDM systems, with images extracted from DICOM files; the packet identifies GE Senographe Essentials and Hologic Selenia Dimension systems and supports CC/MLO pairs or specified single-view inputs.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
A BI-RADS breast-density 5th Edition category is produced for each breast and for each patient, with the patient result based on the maximum category of the two breasts; the browser interface can display the assessment and similar images.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The output is adjunctive and not a diagnostic aid; an MQSA-qualified physician makes the final category. The labeled compatibility is limited to the identified FFDM systems and view configurations. Core software was built and tested on OS X, the GUI on Windows/OS X/Linux, the user computer must share a local network with the server, and a web browser is required.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K173574
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The software works in client-server mode: the user computer and server must be on the same local network, the server performs computation and provides the browser-based interface, and processed images are extracted from DICOM files. The FDA packet does not establish a PACS or RIS interface.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for DenSeeMammo; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
FDA verification and validation covered reproducibility, comparison of left/right and patient-level density results with visual assessments by MQSA-qualified radiologists, GE and Hologic datasets, two-view and single-view configurations, and beta-site testing for physician integration and usability. The packet states that all test acceptance criteria were met; it does not report a device-level sensitivity, specificity, or AUC endpoint.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
Reported specificity
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
DenSeeMammo regulatory performance study summary
Stand-Alone Performance · Population described in the exact-submission ACR model card
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K173574 · Independence not established
K173574
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K173574 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K173574. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Verify care setting and population: Confirm the intended care setting, patient population, and service line.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K173574 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
1Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 1 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Flags calcifications, masses, asymmetries and architectural distortions on compatible FFDM or DBT screening examinations; management must not be based solely on MammoScreen output.
Tags screening cases as suspicious or blank to aid worklist prioritization; radiologists must review every examination and it does not mark original images.
Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...