Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
FDA-cleared profile
eko.ai Pte. Ltd. d/b/a Us2.ai
Authorized purpose: Us2.v1 is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a full report with measurements of several key cardiac structural and functional parameters. The data produced by this software is intended to be used to support qualified cardiologists or licensed primary care providers for clinical decision-making. Us2.v1 is indicated for use in adult patients. Us2.v1 has not been validated for the assessment of congenital heart disease, valve disease, pericardial disease, and/or intra-cardiac lesions (e.g. tumors, thrombi). Please note the following limitations: -Poor image capture will lead to poor annotations and subsequent measurements. Multiple image quality algorithms are used to filter out images of poor quality. -Our software complements good patient care and does not exempt the user from the responsibility to provide supervision, clinically review the patient, and make appropriate clinical decisions. -If no gender is present, female referenced guideline values will be used for conclusions. -If Body surface area (BSA) is not present, indexed values cannot be provided. -During image acquisition, inappropriate use of the echo machine, use of non-cardiac ultrasound probes, use of suboptimal settings (e.g. gain, contrast, depth), or lack of electrocardiogram capture may lead to lower accuracy of the software.
Product overview
Authorized purpose: Us2.v1 is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a full report with measurements of several key cardiac structural and functional parameters. The data produced by this software is intended to be used to support qualified cardiologists or licensed primary care providers for clinical decision-making. Us2.v1 is indicated for use in adult patients. Us2.v1 has not been validated for the assessment of congenital heart disease, valve disease, pericardial disease, and/or intra-cardiac lesions (e.g. tumors, thrombi). Please note the following limitations: -Poor image capture will lead to poor annotations and subsequent measurements. Multiple image quality algorithms are used to filter out images of poor quality. -Our software complements good patient care and does not exempt the user from the responsibility to provide supervision, clinically review the patient, and make appropriate clinical decisions. -If no gender is present, female referenced guideline values will be used for conclusions. -If Body surface area (BSA) is not present, indexed values cannot be provided. -During image acquisition, inappropriate use of the echo machine, use of non-cardiac ultrasound probes, use of suboptimal settings (e.g. gain, contrast, depth), or lack of electrocardiogram capture may lead to lower accuracy of the software.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
Clinical role: Us2.v1 is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a full report with measurements of several key cardiac structural and functional parameters. The data produced by this software is intended to be used to support qualified cardiologists or licensed primary care providers for clinical decision-making. Us2.v1 is indicated for use in adult patients. Us2.v1 has not been validated for the assessment of congenital heart disease, valve disease, pericardial disease, and/or intra-cardiac lesions (e.g. tumors, thrombi). Please note the following limitations: -Poor image capture will lead to poor annotations and subsequent measurements. Multiple image quality algorithms are used to filter out images of poor quality. -Our software complements good patient care and does not exempt the user from the responsibility to provide supervision, clinically review the patient, and make appropriate clinical decisions. -If no gender is present, female referenced guideline values will be used for conclusions. -If Body surface area (BSA) is not present, indexed values cannot be provided. -During image acquisition, inappropriate use of the echo machine, use of non-cardiac ultrasound probes, use of suboptimal settings (e.g. gain, contrast, depth), or lack of electrocardiogram capture may lead to lower accuracy of the software.
Evidence from the reviewed source record: Study type: Stand-Alone Performance. Cases: 600
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Patient-population text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; institutional setting may still require vendor confirmation.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
The replacement uses the packet's direct disease-scope, image-quality, clinical-review, data-availability, and acquisition limitations.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
Scanner manufacturers: All
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for Us2.v1; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-08Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
This field has not been curated yet.
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K210791
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public price or quote for the exact K210791 configuration was established in this review.
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains 20 PubMed and 10 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Discovery metadata alone does not establish exact tested-product, version, population, and endpoint applicability, so all candidates remain quarantined and none was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 20 PubMed and 10 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, fda decision summary packet, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation, purpose, intendedUsers, input, output, evidenceSummary, limitations
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, careSetting, output, limitations, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: postmarketSafety
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
fda record reviewed
Editorial review
Source-reviewed editorial overlay
Alternatives
Ligence Uab
Ligence Heart is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a...
Ultrasight, Ltd.
PVAD IQ supports qualified-physician clinical decision support by identifying the aortic annulus and PVAD inlet, calculating their mean distance, and identifying clips acceptable...
Mycardium AI Limited
Transthoracic echocardiography view classification, cardiac structure segmentation, functional measurements and Doppler review and report support.
DiA Imaging Analysis Ltd.
Automated echocardiographic LV and RV function, wall-motion and strain, bladder-volume and image-quality measurements for clinician review.