Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Transthoracic echocardiography view classification, cardiac structure segmentation, functional measurements and Doppler review and report support.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
Automated view classification, cardiac structure segmentation, Doppler and functional measurements, and more than 100 measurement outputs for clinician review.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
The FDA validation used a separate 200-patient test set and an expert reference standard; subgroup analyses included age, sex, ethnicity, pathology, ultrasound vendor/model/year and image quality. The exact packet does not establish a universal result for other populations or configurations.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K250670
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The current EchoConfidence family page describes vendor-neutral PACS and EHR integration and a human-in-the-loop review, refine and approve workflow; it does not establish the exact K250670 deployment configuration.
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Attach an exact-product deployment and data-flow source.
Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-07
No current exact-USA-release security attestation was established.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Clinician review loop
The current EchoConfidence family page describes reviewing, refining and approving automated measurements before use.
The FDA labeling describes automated view classification, segmentation and more than 100 measurements across chambers, valves, vessels and pericardium.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
The exact FDA validation used 200 echocardiography cases from 200 patients with three human experts as reference. The endpoint was the difference between AI-versus-expert mean absolute error and inter-expert mean absolute error, expressed as a percentage of human-expert MAE; the upper 95% confidence bound had to be below +25% relative to that denominator. The manufacturer reports a relative upper confidence bound below zero without quantifying its magnitude in the reviewed summary.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
Reported specificity
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
EchoConfidence measurement validation
Retrospective clinical validation against three human expert readers · 200 transthoracic echocardiography cases from 200 patients with subgrouping by demographics, pathology, vendor, model, year and image quality
exact submission · Tested version: EchoConfidence release reviewed in K250670 · n=200 · Sponsor or vendor study
K250670 FDA 510(k) summary
The FDA summary says the test data were separate from training data and states the acceptance criterion; it does not establish an observed aggregate performance value in the reviewed text.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-07
No numeric price was published in the reviewed sources.
Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify deployment and data flow: Attach an exact-product deployment and data-flow source.
Verify security and privacy controls: No current exact-USA-release security attestation was established.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No numeric price was published in the reviewed sources.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Human reviewedStatus
2026-09-07Last searched
21Fields reviewed
11Source classes checked
0Reviewed PubMed leads
0Reviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The stored candidate metadata contained empty PubMed and clinical-trial ID arrays; metadata was screened, not full-text or registry-reviewed. The stored recall candidate record was empty and no event was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, vendor product page, vendor manual, peer reviewed publication, clinical trial registry, recall database, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Ligence Heart is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a...
PVAD IQ supports qualified-physician clinical decision support by identifying the aortic annulus and PVAD inlet, calculating their mean distance, and identifying clips acceptable...
Measures global longitudinal strain from apical four-chamber cardiac ultrasound images in adult patients with suspected disease as an aid to diagnostic analysis; users can accept...