uMI Panorama

Evidence summary

Manufacturer-sponsored bench, algorithm, and image review supported the added software functions. The most detailed clinical evaluation was a 13-patient AIEFOV study with a separate test set and two blinded expert readers; it establishes feature-level image performance, not improved clinical outcomes.

FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-02

• Source

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

Postmarket safety review

Not established in reviewed sources

Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.

• Verify security and privacy controls: FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
• Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
• Verify pricing and total cost: FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
• Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
• Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
• Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.

Recovered from the prior exact-submission extraction and normalized under the current provenance rules. The exact FDA summary, exact-identifier recall candidate, and current product-family page were manually reviewed. No matching recall was accepted. Patient outcomes, local interfaces, cybersecurity, staffing, training, service terms, price, total cost, and reimbursement remain separate verification tasks. Automated exact-name discovery found 8 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, fda device recall, vendor product page, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

• K241585 FDA decision source U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2026-08-31
• Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2026-08-31
• PubMed biomedical literature index U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2026-09-01
• ClinicalTrials.gov study registry U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2026-09-01
• openFDA Device Recall API U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2026-09-02
• uMI Panorama product-family page United Imaging Healthcare · 2026-09-02