Quantitative single-timepoint or longitudinal analysis of lesion ROIs on adult PET/CT, including volume, density, and tracer-uptake changes, with a report used as an adjunct to local image interpretation.
Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Quantitative single-timepoint or longitudinal analysis of lesion ROIs on adult PET/CT, including volume, density, and tracer-uptake changes, with a report used as an adjunct to local image interpretation.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
Trained medical professionals including oncologists, nuclear radiologists or physicians, medical imaging technologists, dosimetrists, and physicists; the report is generated by the manufacturer and signed by a U.S. board-certified physician qualified in nuclear radiology or medicine.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
Adult oncology and nuclear-medicine PET/CT workflow; recommended use is for adults aged 22 years or older, with local interpretation performed before and independently of the report.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
Centralized quantitative ROI segmentation, registration, longitudinal change analysis, and report generation as an adjunct to local interpretation; clinicians responsible for patient care or local image interpretation do not directly operate the device.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
CT and PET/CT volumetric images supported by ACR/NEMA DICOM 3.0, with ROIs identified by the software or imported from validated tools or qualified manual contouring. Multi-timepoint use recommends adult PET/CT after FDG with the second FDG administration no more than 12 months after the first; single-timepoint use also covers FDG-, PSMA-, or SSTR-targeted PET drugs per approved labeling.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
A TRAQinform Report with ROI anatomic location, contours and 2D/3D renderings, volumes and volume changes, CT radio-density measures and changes, PET SUVmax/SUVtotal/SUVmean/SUVhetero measures and changes, heterogeneity measures, and computed classification of quantitative FDG ROI changes.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
The device is not intended to diagnose disease, replace CT or PET/CT interpretation, recommend treatment, or replace professional judgment. Binary patient-level progression or non-progression decisions are not established without multidisciplinary review; care-relevant discrepancies require subject-matter review and neutral or blinded adjudication. The stated age, tracer, and timepoint conditions apply.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K233998
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The FDA packet specifies CT and PET/CT DICOM 3.0 input and operation in a cloud environment; exact local PACS, RIS, EHR, interface, version, hosting, and security controls are not established.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for TRAQinform IQ; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
FDA testing included component verification, test-retest analysis, and a pivotal reader study. Test-retest used 31 non-small-cell-lung-cancer patients with two FDG PET/CT studies within one week; limits of repeatability were SUVmax -27.0% to 56.8%, SUVmean -20.2% to 38.5%, SUVtotal -54.1% to 144.5%, and volume -52.6% to 113.9%. The pivotal study used 103 patients with two sequential scans, three oncologist evaluators, and scans from at least 10 imaging centers in at least 3 U.S. states. In a 32-patient reevaluation subset, the 95% CI for overall percent agreement was 41%-76%, positive percent agreement was 14/18 (78%), and negative percent agreement was 5/14 (36%); ROI-level agreement for new, increasing, unchanged, decreasing, and disappearing classifications was 70%, 70%, 85%, 63%, and 90%.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
Reported specificity
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
TRAQinform IQ regulatory performance study summary
Reader Study · Adult
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K233998 · Independence not established
K233998
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K233998 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K233998. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-08
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K233998 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
syngo.via MI Workflows, Scenium, and syngo MBF provide PET, SPECT, nuclear-medicine, CT, and MR viewing, manipulation, quantification, longitudinal comparison, and analysis for...
Aurora is a SPECT/CT system for nuclear-medicine uptake imaging, standalone CT, anatomical localization, attenuation correction, diagnosis, staging, therapy planning, guidance,...
Opulus Lymphoma Precision segments and visualizes lesions and measures total metabolic tumor volume in whole-body FDG-PET/CT for patients already diagnosed with FDG-avid lymphoma;...
uMI Panorama GS combines 148 cm axial-field-of-view PET with CT for qualified healthcare professionals across diagnostic, staging, treatment-planning, and response workflows; this...