Input and worklist workflow
The FDA packet describes DICOM intake from hospital PACS and passive worklist notation for radiologist review.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-14Confirm supported PACS versions, routing, and viewer behavior locally.
FDA-cleared profile
Quanta Computer Inc.
Authorized purpose: QOCA image Smart CXR analyzes adult chest X-ray images and flags cases with suspected pneumothorax to support prioritization for radiologist review.
Product overview
Authorized purpose: QOCA image Smart CXR analyzes adult chest X-ray images and flags cases with suspected pneumothorax to support prioritization for radiologist review.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
Clinical role: QOCA image Smart CXR analyzes adult chest X-ray images and flags cases with suspected pneumothorax to support prioritization for radiologist review.
Evidence from the reviewed source record: The performance of the subject device, QOCA® image Smart CXR Image Processing System, has been validated in two separate pivotal studies. The performance of the subject device across the performance assessment dataset achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 97.8% (95% CI: [97.0%, 98.5%]); in addition, the sensitivity and specificity achieves 92.5% (95% CI: [90.5%, 94.2%]), 94.0% (95% CI: [93.9%, 94.6%]) respectively, without subgroup breakdown.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Clinical-use display mirrors the exact FDA-supported purpose reconciled from the decision-summary packet.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Exact FDA decision-summary packet reviewed on 2026-09-19; existing wording is supported without expansion.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Current security controls, data retention, access model, and assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Current training, competency, and support commitments require vendor confirmation.
Site-specific quality monitoring, update control, escalation, and incident-response commitments require vendor and local governance evidence.
The FDA packet describes DICOM intake from hospital PACS and passive worklist notation for radiologist review.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-14Confirm supported PACS versions, routing, and viewer behavior locally.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
The replacement uses the packet's pivotal-study and aggregate performance results without adding an independent-outcome characterization.
Model sensitivity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
Model specificity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K221868
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No current exact-product price, contract term, or implementation fee was established.
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Exact-submission postmarket candidates remain quarantined pending a separate source review.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda decision summary packet, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: purpose, modality, anatomy, intendedUsers, workflowRole, input, output, careSetting, limitations, evidenceSummary, integration, clinicalUse
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, careSetting, output, limitations, reportedSensitivity, reportedSpecificity, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
fda record reviewed
Editorial review
Source-reviewed editorial overlay
Alternatives
AZmed
Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Ever Fortune.AI, Co., Ltd.
Passive triage of adult AP chest radiographs for an endotracheal-tube tip more than 7 cm above the carina, less than 3 cm above the carina, below the carina in the right or left...
Vuno Inc.
Analyzes adult chest X-rays for suspected pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax and provides case-level PACS or workstation prioritization.
Milvue
Passive worklist prioritization for suspected pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax on frontal PA or AP chest radiographs in transitional adolescents aged 18-21 and adults aged 22...