Authorized purpose: Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: X-ray/Radiography Anatomy or clinical context: Chest/Lung Input: Adult PA or AP chest X-rays received as DICOM studies; the FDA-described validation used 1,000 radiographs for pneumothorax and 1,000 for pleural effusion, with balanced positive and negative case groups.
Who uses it?Intended users: Radiologists and other qualified healthcare professionals reviewing adult chest radiographs.
What does the software produce?Output: A passive study-level header or secondary-capture result sent to PACS/DICOM node for worklist triage; no markup is placed on the original image.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: The product is not a proactive specialist alert, does not annotate the original image, and is not intended as a standalone clinical decision or rule-out system.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: The FDA-described validation included 1,000 pneumothorax and 1,000 pleural-effusion radiographs. Pneumothorax sensitivity was 0.9379, specificity 0.9178 and AUC 0.9857. Pleural-effusion sensitivity was 0.9134, specificity 0.9448 and AUC 0.9830. Reported processing times were about 19.43 and 19.56 seconds respectively.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Passive study-level worklist triage for suspected pneumothorax and/or pleural effusion on adult PA or AP chest X-rays; it is not a proactive specialist alert.
Adult PA or AP chest X-rays received as DICOM studies; the FDA-described validation used 1,000 radiographs for pneumothorax and 1,000 for pleural effusion, with balanced positive and negative case groups.
The product is not a proactive specialist alert, does not annotate the original image, and is not intended as a standalone clinical decision or rule-out system.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
The reviewed sources do not establish exact-release security controls, retention or assurance documentation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Passive PACS worklist triage
The cleared output is a study-level header or secondary capture sent through a DICOM node/PACS workflow without markup on the original image.
AZmed presents Rayvolve as a radiology AI suite intended to fit clinical imaging workflows; the current page does not establish exact hosting, service levels or version for K243808.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
The FDA-described validation included 1,000 pneumothorax and 1,000 pleural-effusion radiographs. Pneumothorax sensitivity was 0.9379, specificity 0.9178 and AUC 0.9857. Pleural-effusion sensitivity was 0.9134, specificity 0.9448 and AUC 0.9830. Reported processing times were about 19.43 and 19.56 seconds respectively.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-07
No public price or quote for Rayvolve PTX-PE was reviewed.
Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-07
Payer policy research was not part of this worker's scope.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-07
The downloaded exact-ID recall packet contained zero records; this limited result does not establish absence of recall or safety information.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify security and privacy controls: The reviewed sources do not establish exact-release security controls, retention or assurance documentation.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for Rayvolve PTX-PE was reviewed.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: Payer policy research was not part of this worker's scope.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: The downloaded exact-ID recall packet contained zero records; this limited result does not establish absence of recall or safety information.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-07Last searched
24Fields reviewed
10Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Stored candidate metadata was screened; no PubMed or trial IDs were returned for this submission. This is not a full-paper review. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, vendor product page, stored candidate metadata, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Passive triage of adult AP chest radiographs for an endotracheal-tube tip more than 7 cm above the carina, less than 3 cm above the carina, below the carina in the right or left...
Passive worklist prioritization for suspected pleural effusion and/or pneumothorax on frontal PA or AP chest radiographs in transitional adolescents aged 18-21 and adults aged 22...