Concurrent or secondary CAD assistance to interpreting physicians for detection, localization, and characterization of soft-tissue densities (masses, architectural distortions, and asymmetries) and calcifications; not a primary read.
Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Concurrent or secondary CAD assistance to interpreting physicians for detection, localization, and characterization of soft-tissue densities (masses, architectural distortions, and asymmetries) and calcifications; not a primary read.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
3D DBT exams from compatible systems: Hologic Selenia Dimensions or 3Dimensions, GE Senographe Essential with SenoClaire, GE Senographe Pristina, Siemens Inspiration, and Siemens Revelation, with the stated Siemens standard or Empire reconstructions where applicable.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Detected regions marked or contoured on DBT slices, with a Certainty of Finding score for each detected region and a Case Score for each study, each represented on a 0%-100% scale; scores and marks assist the physician in identifying findings for confirmation or dismissal.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The output is a concurrent or secondary read and does not replace clinical expertise or primary diagnostic and patient-management decisions. Certainty of Finding and Case Scores are based on a 50% cancer prevalence population, are not calibrated to the intended-use or pivotal-study prevalence, and represent relative suspicion rather than an absolute clinical probability of malignancy. Use is limited to the listed compatible DBT systems.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K203822
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Verification and validation included deployment on a DICOM platform successfully tested for clinical network integration, with output displayed through the compatible DBT and softcopy-workstation workflow described in the packet. Specific local PACS, RIS, or interface compatibility is not established.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
ACR exact-submission catalog context
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for ProFound AI Software V3.0; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
Verification included unit, integration, and regression testing. Hologic and GE supplemental standalone studies compared ProFound AI V3.0 with the prior version using case sensitivity, false-positive rate per 3D volume, and AUC, with non-inferiority conclusions for the described screening populations; paired comparisons reported increased specificity from V2.0 to V3.0. The packet text provides no numeric subject-device sensitivity, specificity, AUC, PPV, NPV, or reader-delta values.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
Reported specificity
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
ProFound AI® Software V3.0 regulatory performance study summary
Stand-Alone Performance · Population described in the exact-submission ACR model card
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K203822 · n=694 · Independence not established
K203822
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K203822 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K203822. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K203822 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
20Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
BAC processes screening FFDM and DBT mammograms to detect the presence or absence of breast arterial calcifications at study and breast level and localize detected calcifications...
Lunit INSIGHT MMG v1.1.10 aids physicians in detection, localization and characterization of suspicious breast-cancer areas on female screening mammograms from compatible FFDM...
Concurrent CADe/x aid for interpreting physicians to detect and characterize breast-cancer-suspicious lesions in screening DBT exams from compatible systems, marking soft-tissue...