Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
FDA-cleared profile
Naitive Technologies Ltd
Opportunistically analyzes standard AP hip or pelvis radiographs in patients aged 50 years and older and issues a report when the estimated femoral-neck BMD is below a preset threshold to prompt clinical bone-health assessment; absence of a report does not rule out low BMD.
Clinical fit
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact clinical-use normalization from the FDA packet; this text is also the locked corrections value.
Intended-user text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Patient-population text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; institutional setting may still require vendor confirmation.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Exact-product limitations and clinician-review boundary from the FDA packet.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Imaging modality reported in the exact-submission ACR AI Central model card.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
Naitive describes OsteoSight as background X-ray analysis intended to provide an evidence-backed flag for orthopedic surgeons before surgery.
product family · checked 2026-09-06Exact site workflow, hosting, and support terms require confirmation.
The peer-reviewed family study reports exclusion of unsuitable cases such as wrong body parts, metalwork, or unacceptable femur positioning before analysis.
product family · checked 2026-09-06Product-family study; it does not establish exact K251408 commercial release behavior.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Structured study metadata from the exact-submission ACR model card; this is not an independent evidence synthesis.
Model sensitivity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
Model specificity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
Sensitivity for femoral-neck BMD below the preset threshold in Intended-use validation of standard AP hip or pelvis radiographs from adults aged 50 years and older across 6 sites.
Tested version: OsteoSight Hip (v1); FDA submission K251408Stand-Alone Performance · Adult
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K251408 · n=3082 · 6 sites · Independence not establishedK251408
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Peer-reviewed diagnostic validation study · US population with hip or pelvic X-rays compared with DXA; robustness and reproducibility were evaluated across demographic groups and scanner hardware
product family · Tested version: OsteoSight product family; exact commercial release not reported · Sponsor or vendor studyPMID:40263144 · PMCID:PMC12122585 · DOI:10.1007/s00198-025-07487-0
Authors include Naitive employees/shareholders; treat as vendor-sponsored family evidence, not independent exact-release performance. The abstract reports preprocessing exclusions for wrong body parts, metalwork, and unacceptable femur positioning.
Economics and lifecycle
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Official non-FDA product sources were reviewed for buyer and workflow context, but no exact-submission amount, currency, unit, term, or implementation fee was displayed. A vendor quote remains required.
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Stored exact-submission candidate metadata had zero PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers; this metadata screening is not a full paper or registry-record review. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, vendor product page, peer reviewed publication, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources
Sources accessed through 2026-09-06.
Alternatives
Milvue
Aids clinicians and radiologists reviewing 2D X-ray radiographs by detecting, localizing, and characterizing fractures across the FDA-listed appendicular, hip/pelvis, clavicle,...
AZmed SAS
Assists radiologists and emergency physicians in detecting fractures on DICOM musculoskeletal radiographs for adults and children aged 2 years or older, limited to the FDA-listed...
IB Lab GmbH
The Knee OsteoArthritis Labeling Assistant (KOALA) software provides metric measurements of the joint space width and indicators for presence or absence of radiographic features...
Alpha Intelligence Manifolds, Inc.
Opportunistic review of frontal lumbar-spine or KUB radiographs in adults aged 50 years and older to flag possible low bone mineral density at L1-L4 for clinician follow-up; a...