Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Automated echo DICOM LV and RV function and contrast-EF, strain, wall-motion, bladder-volume and quality-score support.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
Echocardiography DICOM studies and supported 4-chamber, 2-chamber and 3-chamber views, including contrast-enhanced input where the CE-EF extension is prescribed and supported.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
Global and segmental LV ejection fraction, LV and RV function, wall-motion and strain measures, contrast-EF analysis, bladder volume and image-quality score outputs for review.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
The exact validation used 101 examinations and a reference standard from three sonographers; contrast analysis depends on a prescribed contrast agent and suitable ultrasound equipment. Family LVivo support constraints are not promoted as exact K243235 labeling.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K243235
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The GE LVivo family support article describes clinician acceptance and storage of calculated measurements, while a historical Konica Minolta and DiA release describes LVivo family analysis and reporting on Exa Cardio PACS. These sources do not establish the exact K243235 interfaces.
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-07
No current exact-release security attestation was established.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Echo DICOM analysis
The exact labeling describes automated analysis of echo DICOM views and return of quantitative outputs for clinician review.
The GE family support article describes reviewing, accepting and storing calculated EF outputs; it is older family documentation and not an exact K243235 interface specification.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
The exact FDA performance set included 101 examinations and 91 successfully auto-processed examinations; reported correlations included 4-chamber EDV 0.96, 4-chamber ESV 0.98 and 4-chamber EF 0.95 against the reference measurements.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-07
No numeric price was published in the reviewed sources.
Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify security and privacy controls: No current exact-release security attestation was established.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No numeric price was published in the reviewed sources.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Human reviewedStatus
2026-09-07Last searched
20Fields reviewed
12Source classes checked
0Reviewed PubMed leads
0Reviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The stored candidate metadata contained empty PubMed and clinical-trial ID arrays; metadata was screened, not full-text or registry-reviewed. The stored recall candidate record was empty and no event was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, vendor product page, vendor manual, vendor press release, peer reviewed publication, clinical trial registry, recall database, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Guides medical professionals acquiring ten standard 2D transthoracic echocardiographic views in adults requiring a cardiac ultrasound examination; acquired images require...
Ligence Heart is a fully automated software platform that processes, analyses and makes measurements on acquired transthoracic cardiac ultrasound images, automatically producing a...
PVAD IQ supports qualified-physician clinical decision support by identifying the aortic annulus and PVAD inlet, calculating their mean distance, and identifying clips acceptable...