EFAI Neurosuite CT Midline Shift Assessment System (MLS-CT-100)
Ever Fortune.AI, Co., Ltd.
Authorized purpose: Prioritization and triage of non-contrast head CT cases with features suggestive of midline shift in individuals aged 18 years and older.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Prioritization and triage of non-contrast head CT cases with features suggestive of midline shift in individuals aged 18 years and older.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Prioritization and triage of non-contrast head CT cases with features suggestive of midline shift in individuals aged 18 years and older.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: CT/CTA Anatomy or clinical context: Head/brain, for suspected midline shift (MLS) Input: Non-contrast head CT studies from individuals aged 18 years and older.
Who uses it?Intended users: Radiologists
What does the software produce?Output: Case-level passive notification available to a PACS/workstation for worklist prioritization when suspected MLS is identified; no preview image or marking of a specific location is provided.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: The device is limited to non-contrast head CT and suspected MLS in individuals aged 18 and older, with no user control to select other findings. Results are not for standalone clinical decision-making and are not intended to rule out MLS or preclude clinical assessment. The packet describes on-premise deployment without cloud-server interfacing.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Prioritization and triage of non-contrast head CT cases with features suggestive of midline shift in individuals aged 18 years and older.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA retrospective, blinded, multisite validation used 300 US cases (102 positive and 198 negative) with majority ground truth from three US board-certified radiologists. The dataset included multiple CT manufacturers and a mean age of 59.46 years. Standalone sensitivity was 0.961 (95% CI: 0.903-0.985), specificity was 0.955 (95% CI: 0.916-0.973), AUROC was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.967-0.996), and mean processing time was 62.04 seconds (95% CI: 60.65-63.44); subgroup analyses were also performed.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Prioritization and triage of non-contrast head CT cases with features suggestive of midline shift in individuals aged 18 years and older.
Passive case-level notification and worklist prioritization in parallel with standard-of-care interpretation; the device does not mark a location or triage findings other than MLS.
Case-level passive notification available to a PACS/workstation for worklist prioritization when suspected MLS is identified; no preview image or marking of a specific location is provided.
The device is limited to non-contrast head CT and suspected MLS in individuals aged 18 and older, with no user control to select other findings. Results are not for standalone clinical decision-making and are not intended to rule out MLS or preclude clinical assessment. The packet describes on-premise deployment without cloud-server interfacing.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The device sends case-level notification to a PACS/RIS workstation for worklist prioritization and is deployed only on-premise; the packet states that it does not interface with cloud servers and does not establish a specific local interface or protocol.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for EFAI Neurosuite CT Midline Shift Assessment System (MLS-CT-100); FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA retrospective, blinded, multisite validation used 300 US cases (102 positive and 198 negative) with majority ground truth from three US board-certified radiologists. The dataset included multiple CT manufacturers and a mean age of 59.46 years. Standalone sensitivity was 0.961 (95% CI: 0.903-0.985), specificity was 0.955 (95% CI: 0.916-0.973), AUROC was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.967-0.996), and mean processing time was 62.04 seconds (95% CI: 60.65-63.44); subgroup analyses were also performed.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
EFAI Neurosuite CT Midline Shift Assessment System (MLS-CT-100) regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K241923
Samplen=300
IndependenceIndependence not established
K241923
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K241923 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K241923. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K241923 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
26Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Passive workflow prioritization for studies with imaging patterns consistent with possible total arterial occlusion in the specified vessels; not primary diagnosis, screening,...
Modality
CT/CTA
Anatomy
Aorta and lower-extremity arteries: common iliac, external iliac, common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries
Notification-only triage of adult non-contrast head CT for suspected intracranial hemorrhage and large-vessel occlusion, with parallel communication to trained clinicians during...
Modality
CT/CTA
Anatomy
Brain and intracranial vessels: intracranial hemorrhage and LVO involving ICA, MCA-M1, and MCA-M2