Result destination
PACS and workstation are explicitly referenced as a result destination.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm supported products, versions, routing behavior, and display requirements during local evaluation.
FDA-cleared profile
MedCognetics, Inc.
Authorized purpose: Passive exam-level notification and prioritization of suspicious findings in screening mammograms.
Product overview
Authorized purpose: Passive exam-level notification and prioritization of suspicious findings in screening mammograms.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
Clinical role: Passive exam-level notification and prioritization of suspicious findings in screening mammograms.
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA packet reports 800 retrospective anonymized 2D FFDM exams, 399 biopsy-proven cancer and 401 negative BI-RADS 1/2 cases; AUROC 0.9569 (95% CI 0.9364-0.9738), sensitivity 87%, and specificity 89%. Accuracy 95.6% is not reported.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Clinical-use display mirrors the exact FDA-supported purpose reconciled in this remediation finding.
FDA indications statement.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
FDA indications statement.
FDA intended-use and technological-characteristics scope.
Exact FDA limitation boundary.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Controlled catalog bucket retained; exact FDA scope is 2D FFDM screening mammography, excluding DBT and 2D synthetic views.
FDA comparison-table body part.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
PACS and workstation are explicitly referenced as a result destination.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm supported products, versions, routing behavior, and display requirements during local evaluation.
Scanner manufacturers: All
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for CogNet QmTRIAGE; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-09Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Submission-reported retrospective validation; no subgroup breakdown.
Model sensitivity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
Model specificity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K220080
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public price or quote for the exact K220080 configuration was established in this review.
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, fda decision summary packet, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation, purpose, intendedUsers, input, output, limitations, evidenceSummary
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, output, limitations, reportedSensitivity, reportedSpecificity, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: postmarketSafety
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
fda record reviewed
Editorial review
Source-reviewed editorial overlay
Alternatives
Neurocareai, Inc. (Dba Savelife.Ai)
Tags screening cases as suspicious or blank to aid worklist prioritization; radiologists must review every examination and it does not mark original images.
Medcognetics, Inc.
Prioritizes suspicious screening DBT examinations for MQSA interpreting physicians; every examination remains subject to full physician review.
VinBigData Joint Stock Company
The VinDr-Mammo is a passive notification for prioritization-only, a parallel- workflow software tool used by MQSA qualified interpreting physicians to prioritize patients with...
DeepHealth, Inc.
Provides passive worklist prioritization for compatible FFDM and DBT screening mammograms.