Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Passive, prioritization-only notification of 2D FFDM screening mammograms with at least one suspicious finding at the exam level; not diagnostic.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Passive notification and exam prioritization in parallel with the standard-of-care worklist; the radiologist decides how to use the code and reviews every exam diagnostically.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
DICOM 2D FFDM screening mammograms, with up to four standard views (LCC, LMLO, RCC, and RMLO); the device does not operate for sites using only digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
A DICOM Structured Report with a cmTriage code of Suspicious or blank is routed to the PACS worklist, where the exam may be sorted if the PACS supports that function. No diagnostic information beyond triage categorization is provided.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The device is limited to 2D FFDM screening mammograms and cannot be used where only 3D/DBT is acquired. It is prescription-only, passive rather than a proactive alert, does not alter or remove images, and must not replace full patient evaluation or diagnostic viewer review.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K183285
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
A PACS listener/local DICOM router sends a de-identified and encrypted local copy to the CureMetrix cloud; the result DICOM SR returns through cmEdge, is re-associated with the original study, and is routed to the PACS. PACS features vary by manufacturer and a specific local interface is not established.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
FDA reviewed a retrospective, blinded, multicenter study of 1,255 US mammographic studies (400 biopsy-proven cancers and 855 normal studies with BI-RADS 1/2 and two-year negative follow-up), using up to four standard views per study; the dataset was enriched with cancers. The observed primary sensitivity was 86.9% (95% CI: 83.6%-90.2%) and specificity was 88.5% (95% CI: 86.4%-90.7%). AUC was 0.951 (95% CI: 0.937-0.964) as a separate endpoint. At a separate 84.4% sensitivity operating point, specificity was 94.0% and the population-adjusted mark rate was 6.37%; average timing was 3.35 minutes at 10 Mbit/s upload and 37 Mbit/s download.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
cmTriage regulatory performance study summary
Stand-Alone Performance · Population described in the exact-submission ACR model card
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K183285 · n=1255 · Independence not established
K183285
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K183285 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K183285. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K183285 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
25Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
1Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 1 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Tags screening cases as suspicious or blank to aid worklist prioritization; radiologists must review every examination and it does not mark original images.
The VinDr-Mammo is a passive notification for prioritization-only, a parallel- workflow software tool used by MQSA qualified interpreting physicians to prioritize patients with...
The MedCognetics (CogNet) QmTRIAGE TM software is a passive notification for prioritization-only, parallel-workflow software tool used by MQSA qualified interpreting physicians to...