FDA-cleared profile

BoneView

Gleamer

Authorized purpose: BoneView 1.1-US analyzes eligible 2D radiographs as a concurrent fracture-reading aid. Limb examinations apply to patients aged 2 years and older; pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, thoracic spine, and lumbosacral spine are limited to adults older than 21 years. Clinical users retain diagnostic and patient-management responsibility.

Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.

Product overview

Start with the essentials

Authorized purpose: BoneView 1.1-US analyzes eligible 2D radiographs as a concurrent fracture-reading aid. Limb examinations apply to patients aged 2 years and older; pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, thoracic spine, and lumbosacral spine are limited to adults older than 21 years. Clinical users retain diagnostic and patient-management responsibility.

Overview status: Source-reviewed overview

Clinical takeaway

Clinical role: BoneView 1.1-US analyzes eligible 2D radiographs as a concurrent fracture-reading aid. Limb examinations apply to patients aged 2 years and older; pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, thoracic spine, and lumbosacral spine are limited to adults older than 21 years. Clinical users retain diagnostic and patient-management responsibility.

Evidence takeaway

Evidence from the reviewed source record: The exact submission adds pediatric indications using a 2,000-radiograph standalone study and references the unchanged algorithm's earlier 24-reader, 480-case adult MRMC study. Pediatric operating points and adult aided-reader endpoints are kept distinct.

Clinical details

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
BoneView 1.1-US analyzes eligible 2D radiographs as a concurrent fracture-reading aid. Limb examinations apply to patients aged 2 years and older; pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, thoracic spine, and lumbosacral spine are limited to adults older than 21 years. Clinical users retain diagnostic and patient-management responsibility.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Intended users
Clinicians authorized to diagnose fractures in primary care, emergency medicine, urgent care, specialty care such as orthopedics, and radiologists reviewing radiographs.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Care setting and population
Primary care, emergency medicine, urgent care, specialty care, and radiology workflows for eligible adult and pediatric radiographs.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Workflow role
Concurrent detection and localization aid during radiograph interpretation; the clinical user makes the primary diagnosis and patient-management decision.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Required input
DICOM 2D radiographs in specified views for ankle, foot, knee, tibia/fibula, wrist, hand, elbow, forearm, humerus, shoulder, clavicle, pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, thoracic spine, and lumbosacral spine, subject to age-specific labeling.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Output and human action
A configurable summary image and processed result images with solid or dotted fracture bounding boxes, processing frames, finding counts, and out-of-indication cautions; results can be toggled while original images remain unchanged.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Limitations
Not indicated below age 2. Pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, thoracic spine, and lumbosacral spine are adult-only. Use is limited to the specified body parts and views; out-of-scope images can return NOT AVAILABLE. Results are concurrent decision support and do not replace clinical interpretation.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K222176
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
X-ray/Radiography
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Anatomy
Spine
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

The controlled directory anatomy is Spine; exact labeling also covers specified limbs, pelvis, hip, femur, ribs, and clavicle.

Clearance type
510(k)
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2023-03-02
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
BoneView receives studies from a DICOM source through an intermediate DICOM node and returns result files to a DICOM destination such as PACS or radiological equipment for viewing or onward transfer. Source and destination can differ.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Deployment and data flow
On-premise or cloud deployment connected to computing platforms, X-ray systems, or PACS, as described in the exact FDA comparison table.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

Current hosting region, retention, availability, and contracted topology still require site-specific confirmation.

Security and privacy
The exact FDA comparison table labels the device HIPAA compliant; it does not disclose the control scope, audit period, encryption, access-control, vulnerability-management, or incident-response evidence needed for procurement review.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
  • Vendor confirmation
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

Exact-version onboarding, role-based training, competency checks, support response, and retraining after updates were not established.

Monitoring and change control
Monitor age and body-part eligibility, supported-view routing, NOT AVAILABLE results, bounding-box operating point, DICOM delivery, disagreements and overrides, false negatives and false positives, downstream imaging/referrals, downtime, updates, complaints, and exact-submission recalls.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

Buyer acceptance guidance derived from FDA labeling and NICE evidence gaps; it is not a claimed vendor monitoring service.

Exact DICOM source-to-destination workflow

The exact packet describes automatic receipt through an intermediate DICOM node and return of summary/result images to a potentially different DICOM destination for PACS or equipment viewing.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-08

Current BoneView family workflow

Gleamer's current US BoneView page describes automatic second reading of trauma X-rays integrated into the reading workflow for adults and children over age 2. Current family claims are not used to broaden the exact K222176 body-part, view, or age labeling.

product family · checked 2026-09-08

NICE evidence-generation controls

NICE HTG739 calls for clear local disagreement protocols and evidence collection on diagnostic accuracy, costs, referrals, treatment changes, software failures, subgroup performance, implementation costs, and postmarket surveillance during conditional NHS use.

product family · checked 2026-09-08

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.

Evidence summary
The exact submission adds pediatric indications using a 2,000-radiograph standalone study and references the unchanged algorithm's earlier 24-reader, 480-case adult MRMC study. Pediatric operating points and adult aided-reader endpoints are kept distinct.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Reported sensitivity
Pediatric standalone: 90.9% at the high-sensitivity operating point and 79.2% at the high-specificity operating point; adult carried-forward MRMC aided sensitivity: 75.2%.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08
Reported specificity
Pediatric standalone: 82.1% at the high-sensitivity operating point and 96.5% at the high-specificity operating point; adult carried-forward MRMC aided specificity: 95.6%.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

Pediatric high-sensitivity operating-point sensitivity

90.9 percent

  • EndpointExamination-level fracture sensitivity at DOUBT FRACT operating point
  • Population2,000 radiographs from patients aged 2-21 years; 1,000 positive and 1,000 negative examinations
  • Tested versionBoneView 1.1-US configuration described in K222176

Pediatric high-sensitivity operating-point specificity

82.1 percent

  • EndpointExamination-level fracture specificity at DOUBT FRACT operating point
  • Population2,000 radiographs from patients aged 2-21 years; 1,000 positive and 1,000 negative examinations
  • Tested versionBoneView 1.1-US configuration described in K222176

Pediatric high-specificity operating-point specificity

96.5 percent

  • EndpointExamination-level fracture specificity at FRACT operating point
  • Population2,000 radiographs from patients aged 2-21 years; 1,000 positive and 1,000 negative examinations
  • Tested versionBoneView 1.1-US configuration described in K222176

Pediatric high-specificity operating-point sensitivity

79.2 percent

  • EndpointExamination-level fracture sensitivity at FRACT operating point
  • Population2,000 radiographs from patients aged 2-21 years; 1,000 positive and 1,000 negative examinations
  • Tested versionBoneView 1.1-US configuration described in K222176

Adult carried-forward aided-reader sensitivity

75.2 percent

  • EndpointReader fracture-detection sensitivity with BoneView assistance
  • Population480 adult cases interpreted by 24 readers in the predicate MRMC study
  • Tested versionUnchanged BoneView algorithm carried forward in K222176 from K212365

Adult carried-forward aided-reader specificity

95.6 percent

  • EndpointReader fracture-detection specificity with BoneView assistance
  • Population480 adult cases interpreted by 24 readers in the predicate MRMC study
  • Tested versionUnchanged BoneView algorithm carried forward in K222176 from K212365

K222176 BoneView pediatric standalone validation

  • DesignStandalone fracture-detection performance comparison between pediatric and adult datasets at prespecified high-sensitivity and high-specificity operating points.
  • Population2,000 radiographs from patients aged 2-21 years, balanced between fracture-positive and fracture-negative examinations and spanning the pediatric-labeled anatomy and eight manufacturers.
  • Scopeexact submission
  • Tested versionBoneView 1.1-US configuration described in K222176
  • Samplen=2000
  • IndependenceSponsor or vendor study

K222176

The packet states the pediatric dataset was separate from training, tuning, and operating-point data. Dataset separation does not establish independent investigators.

BoneView adult MRMC study carried forward in K222176

  • DesignFully crossed retrospective multiple-reader, multiple-case study with aided and unaided sessions separated by at least one month.
  • Population480 adult cases interpreted by 24 clinical readers, with a three-US-board-certified-radiologist reference standard and multiple manufacturers.
  • Scopeexact submission
  • Tested versionUnchanged BoneView algorithm carried forward in K222176 from K212365
  • Samplen=480
  • IndependenceSponsor or vendor study

K222176 · K212365

The K222176 summary says no new clinical study was conducted and carries this predicate study forward because the algorithm was unchanged.

Costs and setup

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

NICE's GBP 1-per-scan figure is an exploratory model assumption, not a BoneView quote or public list price.

Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

NICE HTG739 is conditional English NHS adoption guidance, not a payer coverage or product-specific reimbursement determination.

No product-specific code

NICE HTG739 conditionally recommends BoneView for NHS use during a two-year evidence-generation period, subject to evidence-generation agreements and appropriate regulatory and DTAC approval; this is not a reimbursement determination.

NICE guidance for the NHS in England · England · Effective 2025-01-14

NICE's exploratory model uses GBP 1 per scan and states actual software, implementation, and postmarket costs are uncertain. Treat that figure as a health-technology-model assumption, not a vendor quote.

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
The exact-submission FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K222176. This limited query does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information.
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-08

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Human reviewedStatus
2026-09-08Last searched
26Fields reviewed
12Source classes checked
20Screened PubMed leads
6Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

Stored PubMed and trial candidates were screened by identifier and metadata only. None was promoted without full-text or registry-record review; this is not a systematic evidence review. The current discovery snapshot contains 20 PubMed and 6 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, vendor product page, health technology guidance, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, stored candidate metadata, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources & history

How this profile was documented

Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.

View source ledger and history

Source ledger

  1. K222176 FDA decision source

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-08-31

    Scope: regulatoryIdentity, purpose, modality, anatomy

  2. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-08-31

    Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext

  3. BoneView model card (K222176)

    American College of Radiology - Published 2026-08-17 - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: purpose, modality, intendedUsers, careSetting, output, limitations, reportedSensitivity, reportedSpecificity, evidenceSummary, anatomy, evidenceStudies

  4. PubMed biomedical literature index

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery

  5. ClinicalTrials.gov study registry

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus

  6. openFDA Device Recall API

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-09-02

    Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching

  7. FDA 510(k) K222176: BoneView 1.1-US

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Published 2023-03-02 - Accessed 2026-09-07

    Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation, security

  8. BoneView AI fracture detection

    Gleamer - Accessed 2026-09-08

    Scope: productFamily, clinicalWorkflow, implementationCapabilities

  9. NICE HTG739: AI technologies to help detect fractures on X-rays in urgent care

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence - Published 2025-01-14 - Accessed 2026-09-08

    Scope: conditionalAdoption, economics, evidenceGaps, implementationCapabilities

  10. openFDA exact recall query for K222176

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-09-07

    Scope: postmarketSafety

Research history

  1. K222176 FDA decision

    Regulatory record

    510(k)

  2. Source-review record updated

    Research record

    human reviewed

  3. Reader overview source-reviewed

    Editorial review

    Source-reviewed editorial overlay

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K251078

AutoDensity

Eos Imaging

AutoDensity estimates L1-L4 spine bone-mineral density from EOSedge dual-energy AP radiographs for opportunistic orthopedic pre-surgical assessment; it is not a replacement for...

Modality
X-ray/Radiography
Anatomy
Spine
Decision
2025-11-14
FDA-cleared K241593

BoneMetrics (US)

Gleamer SAS

BoneMetrics is fully automated software that assists trained radiology professionals with Cobb-angle measurement on frontal spine radiographs in patients aged four years or older...

Modality
X-ray/Radiography
Anatomy
Spine
Decision
2025-02-05
FDA-cleared K221632

Spine CAMP™

Medical Metrics, Inc.

Automated analysis of sagittal lumbar and cervical spine radiographs to produce static and motion metrics supporting qualified practitioners' decision-making in skeletally mature...

Modality
X-ray/Radiography
Anatomy
Spine
Decision
2022-10-18
FDA-cleared K212005

UNiD Spine Analyzer

MEDICREA International, Inc.

Assist health care professionals in viewing and measuring images and planning orthopedic and spine surgery, including implant-related measurements.

Modality
X-ray/Radiography
Anatomy
Spine
Decision
2022-01-12