AVIEW RT ACS is a medical image-management and processing system for radiation-treatment planning with deep-learning auto-segmentation evidence described in the exact FDA decision material; the submission compares automated organ segmentation with a predicate using Dice similarity coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance on CT cases.
Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
AVIEW RT ACS is a medical image-management and processing system for radiation-treatment planning with deep-learning auto-segmentation evidence described in the exact FDA decision material; the submission compares automated organ segmentation with a predicate using Dice similarity coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance on CT cases.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Automated contours, plans, registrations, dose values, or other outputs require qualified review, editing, commissioning, and local validation before clinical use.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K220408
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Organs at risk across breast, head and neck, abdomen, and pelvis CT validation cases, including lung, heart, eyes, brain, mandible, kidneys, liver, femur, and bladder
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The exact FDA material lists DICOM testing, a DICOM conformance statement, and thin-client/server compatibility testing; exact local interfaces, identity, routing, and treatment-planning integration require validation.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Public sources reviewed here do not establish the complete exact-release security posture, including identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote access, vulnerability management, backup, or incident response.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Workflow role
Radiation-treatment planning, image registration, contouring, dose calculation, or plan review support under qualified professional control.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04
Submission-anchored workflow summary, not a local acceptance or deployment result.
The exact FDA material lists DICOM testing, a DICOM conformance statement, and thin-client/server compatibility testing; exact local interfaces, identity, routing, and treatment-planning integration require validation.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04
Validate the local workflow against the exact release and enabled options.
Current vendor material is product-family context for K220408 only; exact release, enabled options, deployment, security, interoperability, pricing, and local workflow require confirmation.
product family · checked 2026-09-04
Vendor material is not exact-release evidence unless that linkage is separately proven.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
The exact FDA material describes a 120-case Korean and U.S. CT validation dataset reviewed with a three-physician radiation-oncology gold-standard process across breast, head and neck, abdomen, and pelvis organ sets; reported endpoints include DSC and 95% Hausdorff distance.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
FDA submission-specific verification and validation evidence for K220408
FDA 510(k) regulatory decision material and submission-specific verification or validation evidence for K220408; this is regulatory evidence, not an independent clinical effectiveness study. · The labeled population, anatomy, images, and test materials described in the exact FDA decision material for K220408; a broader clinical population is not established here.
exact submission · Tested version: AVIEW RT ACS (K220408) · n=120 · 3 sites · Sponsor or vendor study
K220408
The exact FDA material describes a 120-case Korean and U.S. CT validation dataset reviewed with a three-physician radiation-oncology gold-standard process across breast, head and neck, abdomen, and pelvis organ sets; reported endpoints include DSC and 95% Hausdorff distance.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
No public exact-release price, license fee, subscription, contract, or implementation cost was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not applicable
Not applicable Not applicable Checked 2026-09-04
CMS coverage-index context was checked, but no product-specific coverage or reimbursement determination is inferred.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify security and privacy controls: Public sources reviewed here do not establish the complete exact-release security posture, including identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote access, vulnerability management, backup, or incident response.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public exact-release price, license fee, subscription, contract, or implementation cost was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: CMS coverage-index context was checked, but no product-specific coverage or reimbursement determination is inferred.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-04Last searched
30Fields reviewed
11Source classes checked
0Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Recovered from the prior exact-submission extraction and normalized under the current provenance rules. Exact-name and exact-submission searches in the checked 2026-09-01 literature and trial indexes returned no PubMed candidate records and no ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records for K220408; the checked openFDA snapshot returned no recall candidate records. Candidate records remain quarantined unless exact product and version linkage is established. Current vendor material is product-family context only. Pricing, complete security architecture, contracted deployment, exact reimbursement, and local interoperability remain unverified. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, vendor product page, implementation documentation, reimbursement policy, peer reviewed literature, clinical trial registry, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
MVision AI Segmentation automatically generates initial contours from CT images for radiotherapy planning; the contours are transferred for professional visualization, review,...
Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
Head and neck, brain, breast, lung and abdomen, male pelvis, and female pelvis structures
DeepContour uses deep-learning CT processing to generate editable organ contours and RTSTRUCT objects for selected adult radiation-treatment planning workflows, with quantitative...
RayStation 12A is configurable software for radiation therapy and medical oncology that proposes treatment plans from user input. Authorized users may use reviewed and approved...
Microsoft Radiomics App v1.0 is a software-only medical device for trained radiation oncologists, dosimetrists, and physicists to derive organ and tumor contours for...
Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
CT and MR images; tumors and healthy anatomical structures for radiotherapy planning