- Integration
- The FDA material describes upload of de-identified DICOM CT to a cloud workflow, processing through an internal server, and a custom OHIF-based interface for reviewing outputs.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
This is the interface boundary described in the exact FDA decision material; current local compatibility, routing, identity, archive, and downtime behavior still require acceptance testing.
- Deployment and data flow
- The FDA material describes a cloud-based Python workflow using an encrypted Google Cloud Platform folder and an internal server; current hosting, access, retention, security qualification, and site configuration remain unverified.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
This is the release-level boundary described in the exact FDA decision material; current hosting, contracts, security, availability, upgrade path, and site configuration remain separate evidence.
- Security and privacy
- Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Public materials reviewed for this exact release do not establish the complete security posture. Request data-flow, identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote-access, vulnerability-management, backup, and incident-response evidence.
- Training and support
- Only Orthopedic surgeons and other trained healthcare professionals involved in knee surgical planning should operate or interpret the product; local onboarding must cover the exact release, supported population, limitations, failure examples, escalation, downtime, and competency documentation.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
- Monitoring and change control
- Monitor K241961 by exact hardware, software, model, algorithm version, patient population, anatomy, protocol, operator, input quality, output edits or overrides, failed studies, repeat acquisition or rework, downstream impact, downtime, incidents, recalls, and updates. Track these product-specific limits: The FDA material states that the output does not provide an individual implant fit and supplies initial cut planes; expert judgment remains required, and physical replicas are for diagnostic orthopedic use within the labeled workflow.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Buyer-facing monitoring guidance derived from the exact cleared scope; it is not a claim that the FDA package provides a live monitoring service.
Release and scope verification
Map installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, outputs, and enabled functions to K241961 before acceptance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04 Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared release includes them.
Deployment boundary
The FDA material describes a cloud-based Python workflow using an encrypted Google Cloud Platform folder and an internal server; current hosting, access, retention, security qualification, and site configuration remain unverified.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04 FDA-described deployment boundaries do not establish current hosting contracts, security controls, uptime, or local qualification.
Interoperability acceptance
The FDA material describes upload of de-identified DICOM CT to a cloud workflow, processing through an internal server, and a custom OHIF-based interface for reviewing outputs.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04 Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally.
Clinical acceptance
Use a signed local test set for the supported population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. The FDA material states that the output does not provide an individual implant fit and supplies initial cut planes; expert judgment remains required, and physical replicas are for diagnostic orthopedic use within the labeled workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04 Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.
Economic evaluation
Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.
product family · checked 2026-09-04 No exact-product price was found in the reviewed public material; productivity or value claims require local evidence.
Lifecycle monitoring
Monitor K241961 by exact hardware, software, model, algorithm version, patient population, anatomy, protocol, operator, input quality, output edits or overrides, failed studies, repeat acquisition or rework, downstream impact, downtime, incidents, recalls, and updates.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04 Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes.