This medical device is intended to segment Cardiac chambers as anatomical structures on contrast or non-contrast MR scans of adult patients that undergo Cardiac MR procedures. The algorithm is not specific to any gender or ethnic group or clinical conditions.
Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
This medical device is intended to segment Cardiac chambers as anatomical structures on contrast or non-contrast MR scans of adult patients that undergo Cardiac MR procedures. The algorithm is not specific to any gender or ethnic group or clinical conditions.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Exact-submission indication text from the ACR AI Central model card. FDA labeling remains controlling.
MR images or data. Inclusion criteria: Patients must be 18 years or older; must have DICOM-compliant cardiovascular MR images. For Cine-ax: 4D multiphase balance gradient echo (GRE) covering the heart with GE, Philips, or Siemens scanner; with or without contrast enhancement; scan orientation of LV short axis; ECG-gating and breath sync; matrix size [125:512]x[125:512]; slice thickness [6:10] mm; interslice gap [0:2] mm. For De-ax: 3D multi-slice IR single phase covering the heart with GE, Philips, or Siemens scanner; scan orientation of LV short axis; ECG-gating and breath sync; matrix size [125:512]x[125:512]; slice thickness [6:10] mm; interslice gap [0:2] mm.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
The device outputs DICOM files containing segmentation of cardiac chambers: epicardial and endocardial border walls of the left ventricle (LV myocardium and LV chamber) and endocardial border wall of the right ventricle (RV chamber) for the Cine-ax algorithm; and epicardial and endocardial border walls of the left ventricle (LV chamber and LV myocardium) for the De-ax algorithm. Results are intended to assist physicians in diagnosis or treatment planning.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.
Regulatory identity
FDA record and catalog context
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K241312
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The exact-submission ACR model card explicitly references DICOM in the described input, output, or workflow; exact interfaces, versions, and local compatibility require confirmation.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Attach an exact-product deployment and data-flow source.
Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01
The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
Reported specificity
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
TeraRecon Cardiac.Chambers.MR (1.0.0) regulatory performance study summary
Stand-Alone Performance · Adult
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K241312 · n=100 · Independence not established
K241312
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify limitations: Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.
Verify deployment and data flow: Attach an exact-product deployment and data-flow source.
Verify security and privacy controls: FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-04Last searched
16Fields reviewed
6Source classes checked
0Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Myomics assists qualified medical professionals with viewing, post-processing and qualitative/quantitative evaluation of 3T cardiovascular MR images in DICOM format, including...
Sonic DL is deep-learning MRI reconstruction for highly undersampled or accelerated cardiac acquisitions on compatible GE 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems for pediatric and adult...