FDA-cleared profile

SpotLight/SpotLight Duo with Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Option

Arineta Ltd.

SpotLight and Duo produce cross-sectional images from X-ray transmission data for cardiovascular and thoracic examinations, including heart imaging with or without contrast and low-dose lung-cancer-screening protocols under established governmental or professional guidance.

Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.

Clinical fit

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
SpotLight and Duo produce cross-sectional images from X-ray transmission data for cardiovascular and thoracic examinations, including heart imaging with or without contrast and low-dose lung-cancer-screening protocols under established governmental or professional guidance.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Intended users
Qualified CT technologists and trained interpreting or treating physicians.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Care setting and population
Hospital and outpatient CT, interventional, cardiovascular, or oncology departments within the labeled scope.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Workflow role
CT acquisition, reconstruction, visualization, image processing, and examination-planning support under professional review.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Required input
X-ray transmission or projection data acquired under supported patient, protocol, contrast, dose, and reconstruction conditions.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Output and human action
Cross-sectional CT images, reformats, measurements, quantitative results, and planning datasets for professional review.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Limitations
Use only the cleared populations, protocols, reconstructions, applications, and patient-size limits; local dose, image-quality, geometry, and downstream acceptance remain necessary.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K241200
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
CT/CTA
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Anatomy
Cardiovascular, thoracic, and lung anatomy
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Clearance type
510(k)
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2025-01-13
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
Standards-based DICOM/PACS integration was identified in the FDA submission materials; compatibility with a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, or orchestrator requires confirmation.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.

Deployment and data flow
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

The exact installed deployment, hosting, service, and operational boundary is not established by the reviewed public FDA material.

Security and privacy
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

The FDA decision material does not establish the complete security posture for the exact product and deployment. Obtain architecture, identity, audit, encryption, retention, support-access, vulnerability-management, and incident-response evidence.

Training and support
Only qualified ct technologists and trained interpreting or treating physicians should operate or interpret the product. Local onboarding should cover the exact release, supported population, limitations, failure examples, escalation, downtime, and competency documentation.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Monitoring and change control
Monitor K241200 by exact software, hardware, model, and algorithm version; patient population; anatomy; protocol; operator; input quality; output edits or overrides; failed studies; repeat acquisition or rework; downstream impact; downtime; incidents; recalls; and updates. Track these product-specific limits: Use is limited by the cleared patient population, acquisition and dose protocols, contrast conditions, and trained professional interpretation; the low-dose screening option has its own labeled eligibility and protocol limits.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

Release and scope verification

Map the installed model, build, options, population, anatomy, inputs, outputs, and enabled functions to K241200 before acceptance.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Later product-family features are not evidence that this cleared release includes them.

Interoperability acceptance

Exact public integration details remain incomplete; establish and test the supported input, output, identity, routing, archive, report, and downtime contract locally.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Test representative identifiers, orientation, geometry, measurements, units, routing, failure handling, and round trips locally.

Clinical acceptance

Use a signed local test set for the exact labeled population and workflow. Include common and difficult cases, exclusions, acquisition variation, failed or low-quality inputs, reviewer overrides, and downstream effects. Use only the cleared populations, protocols, reconstructions, applications, and patient-size limits; local dose, image-quality, geometry, and downstream acceptance remain necessary.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Define stop-use, escalation, rollback, and revalidation triggers before production use.

Economic evaluation

Model capital and recurring cost against net staff time after review, throughput, repeat imaging or rework, room time, consumables, infrastructure, training, service, downtime, upgrade, and replacement costs.

product family · checked 2026-09-04

No exact-product price was found in reviewed public material; productivity or value claims require local evidence.

Lifecycle monitoring

Monitor by exact hardware, software, model, and algorithm version; patient population; anatomy; protocol; operator; input quality; output edits or overrides; failed studies; repeat acquisition or rework; downstream impact; downtime; incidents; recalls; and updates.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

Revalidate after material software, hardware, model, protocol, interface, or clinical-policy changes. No exact native-submission recall record was found in the checked snapshot; this does not exclude other product-family or later signals.

Deployment boundary

The exact installed deployment, hosting, service, security, and operational boundary remains unverified and requires site-specific confirmation.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-04

FDA-described deployment details do not establish current hosting contracts, security controls, uptime, or local qualification.

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.

Evidence summary
The exact FDA 510(k) decision material establishes the submission identity, labeled use, inputs, population, and configuration boundary summarized here. No product-wide clinical-performance or outcome claim is promoted without an exact endpoint and version linkage.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
Reported sensitivity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No single product-level sensitivity value was promoted because the reviewed FDA material is workflow, module, sequence, or population specific.

Reported specificity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No single product-level specificity value was promoted because the reviewed FDA material is workflow, module, sequence, or population specific.

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

K241200 FDA evidence package for SpotLight/SpotLight Duo with Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Option

FDA 510(k) decision evidence package reviewed for exact submission identity and labeled scope · Labeled population and configuration described in the K241200 FDA decision material

exact submission · Tested version: SpotLight and Duo configuration described in K241200 · Sponsor or vendor study

K241200

Manufacturer evidence submitted for the exact FDA decision. It is not independent clinical validation, and local technical, clinical, privacy, security, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.

K241200 FDA evidence package for SpotLight/SpotLight Duo with Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening Option

FDA 510(k) verification and validation evidence described in the exact submission · Cardiovascular, thoracic, and lung anatomy

exact submission · Tested version: SpotLight and SpotLight Duo configuration described in K241200 · Sponsor or vendor study

K241200

Manufacturer evidence submitted for the exact FDA decision. It is not independent clinical validation, and local technical, clinical, privacy, security, and workflow acceptance remains necessary.

Economics and lifecycle

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No public list price for the exact cleared product version was established. Obtain a written quote separating license, implementation, interfaces, compute, storage, training, support, upgrades, renewal, and exit costs.

Reimbursement and coding
No separate named-product Medicare payment was identified in the reviewed CMS coverage material. Evaluate the product within the applicable imaging, procedural, or surgical service line and verify payer, site-of-service, and coding assumptions independently.
Public source Not applicable Checked 2026-09-04

No product-specific code

No separate named-product payment identified in reviewed public material

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · United States

Build a local total-cost and value model; do not infer reimbursement from FDA clearance or approval.

No product-specific code

No separate named-product payment identified in reviewed CMS material

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · United States

This is not a product-specific reimbursement determination. Verify payer, site-of-service, coding, and coverage assumptions independently.

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
The 2026-09-02 openFDA device-recall snapshot contained no record matched to K241200 by exact native submission identifier. This does not exclude product-family, later, or adverse-event information.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

Exact-identifier review does not prove absence of all product-family safety signals.

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-04Last searched
26Fields reviewed
10Source classes checked
20Reviewed PubMed leads
10Reviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

Screened 20 PubMed titles and 10 trial records. The records are lexical matches for spotlight, including an unrelated concussion app, and none identifies Arineta SpotLight or SpotLight Duo under K241200; all 30 are quarantined. The current discovery snapshot contains 20 PubMed and 10 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, fda decision material, peer reviewed literature, clinical trial registry, reimbursement policy, fda device recall, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources

Source ledger

Sources accessed through 2026-09-04.

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K253786

syngo.CT Coronary Cockpit

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

An extension for syngo.via that assists trained physicians with automated and semi-automated analysis, visualization and reporting of cardiac CT angiography volume datasets for...

Modality
CT/CTA
Anatomy
Heart/Cardiovascular
Decision
2026-06-25
FDA-cleared K253560

Enhanced Boundary for PCCT

Ge Medical Systems, LLC

Enhanced Boundary for PCCT is a deep-learning CT processing function for improved soft-tissue delineation in routine head examinations with or without contrast.

Modality
CT/CTA
Anatomy
Head
Decision
2026-06-24