Authorized purpose: Analyze fetal ultrasound images and clips to automatically detect views, detect anatomical structures within views, and verify view-quality criteria as a concurrent reading aid during acquisition and interpretation.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Analyze fetal ultrasound images and clips to automatically detect views, detect anatomical structures within views, and verify view-quality criteria as a concurrent reading aid during acquisition and interpretation.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Analyze fetal ultrasound images and clips to automatically detect views, detect anatomical structures within views, and verify view-quality criteria as a concurrent reading aid during acquisition and interpretation.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: Ultrasound Anatomy or clinical context: Fetus and fetal anatomy Input: Fetal ultrasound images and clips received from an ultrasound machine through the Edge Software; the FDA description covers first-, second-, and third-trimester examinations and real-time processing.
Who uses it?Intended users: Qualified and trained healthcare professionals in prenatal ultrasound, including sonographers, maternal-fetal-medicine specialists, OB/GYNs, and fetal surgeons.
What does the software produce?Output: Automatically detected views, anatomical structures within supported views, and verified or not-verified standardized quality criteria, including structure presence/absence and zoom level; users can reassign or edit the results.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: The FDA packet states that Sonio Detect was validated and is intended only for GE, Canon, and Samsung ultrasound devices. Performance statements apply to the tested view, structure, annotation, and quality-criterion endpoints, including only some views and structures, not to an unrestricted fetal-ultrasound claim.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Analyze fetal ultrasound images and clips to automatically detect views, detect anatomical structures within views, and verify view-quality criteria as a concurrent reading aid during acquisition and interpretation.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: Standalone bench testing used 17,885 fetal-ultrasound images from seven clinical sites in the United States, France, and Germany, independent of model-development data. Reported endpoints included 3D-image detection sensitivity 0.980 (95% Wilson CI 0.930-0.994), Doppler-image sensitivity 0.963 (0.908-0.985), annotation-reading proportion correct 0.923 (0.905-0.938), some T1-view sensitivity 0.942, some T2/T3-view sensitivity 0.919, fetal-brain structure sensitivity/specificity 0.857/0.963, fetal-heart structure sensitivity/specificity 0.900/0.982, and brain-view zoom sensitivity/specificity 0.952/0.906 (95% Wilson CIs 0.909-0.976 and 0.758-0.968). Clinical studies were stated to be not applicable for substantial equivalence.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Analyze fetal ultrasound images and clips to automatically detect views, detect anatomical structures within views, and verify view-quality criteria as a concurrent reading aid during acquisition and interpretation.
Qualified and trained healthcare professionals in prenatal ultrasound, including sonographers, maternal-fetal-medicine specialists, OB/GYNs, and fetal surgeons.
Professional prenatal ultrasound imaging environment across first, second, and third trimesters; the FDA device description states a gestational-age range of 11-37 weeks and does not specify a facility type.
Concurrent acquisition and interpretation support that labels views, detects structures, verifies quality criteria, and lets the healthcare professional review or override assignments and verification status.
Fetal ultrasound images and clips received from an ultrasound machine through the Edge Software; the FDA description covers first-, second-, and third-trimester examinations and real-time processing.
Automatically detected views, anatomical structures within supported views, and verified or not-verified standardized quality criteria, including structure presence/absence and zoom level; users can reassign or edit the results.
The FDA packet states that Sonio Detect was validated and is intended only for GE, Canon, and Samsung ultrasound devices. Performance statements apply to the tested view, structure, annotation, and quality-criterion endpoints, including only some views and structures, not to an unrestricted fetal-ultrasound claim.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The FDA description states that Edge Software runs on a server on the same network as the ultrasound machine, receives DICOM instances, uploads them to Sonio Cloud, and provides SaaS access through an internet browser; exact current interfaces and local compatibility are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for Sonio Detect; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
Standalone bench testing used 17,885 fetal-ultrasound images from seven clinical sites in the United States, France, and Germany, independent of model-development data. Reported endpoints included 3D-image detection sensitivity 0.980 (95% Wilson CI 0.930-0.994), Doppler-image sensitivity 0.963 (0.908-0.985), annotation-reading proportion correct 0.923 (0.905-0.938), some T1-view sensitivity 0.942, some T2/T3-view sensitivity 0.919, fetal-brain structure sensitivity/specificity 0.857/0.963, fetal-heart structure sensitivity/specificity 0.900/0.982, and brain-view zoom sensitivity/specificity 0.952/0.906 (95% Wilson CIs 0.909-0.976 and 0.758-0.968). Clinical studies were stated to be not applicable for substantial equivalence.
FDA endpoint-specific sensitivity: 3D fetal-ultrasound image detection 0.980 (95% Wilson CI 0.930-0.994); Doppler image detection 0.963 (0.908-0.985); some T1 views 0.942 point estimate; some T2/T3 views 0.919 point estimate; some fetal-brain structures 0.857 point estimate; some fetal-heart structures 0.900 point estimate; brain-view zoom verification 0.952 (95% Wilson CI 0.909-0.976).
FDA source
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
The FDA reports multiple view-, image-type-, structure-, and quality-criterion sensitivities; the baseline's isolated 0.980 value is not a device-wide endpoint.
FDA endpoint-specific specificity: some fetal-brain structures 0.963 point estimate; some fetal-heart structures 0.982 point estimate; brain-view zoom verification 0.906 (95% Wilson CI 0.758-0.968).
FDA source
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
Specificity is reported only for bounded structure and zoom-quality endpoints; annotation-reading proportion correct and view-detection sensitivities are separate measures.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Sonio Detect regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationPopulation described in the exact-submission ACR model card
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K230365
Samplen=17885
Sites7
IndependenceIndependence not established
K230365
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K230365 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K230365. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K230365 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
25Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Assist qualified MSK-ultrasound professionals by highlighting supported joint anatomy and detection completeness on compatible adult ultrasound images; it is not a diagnostic...
Modality
Ultrasound
Anatomy
Musculoskeletal joints: shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, knee, and ankle/foot.
Sonio Detect v3 analyzes fetal ultrasound images and clips to detect views and anatomical structures and to check labeled image-quality characteristics during acquisition or...
BioticsAI assists healthcare professionals during and after fetal ultrasound acquisition and interpretation by detecting views and anatomical structures and facilitating...