FDA-cleared profile

QyScore Software

Qynapse

Authorized purpose: Automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from MR images, with comparison to reference percentile data; not intended for clinical scenarios requiring evaluation of the number of white matter hyperintensities.

Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.

Product overview

Start with the essentials

Authorized purpose: Automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from MR images, with comparison to reference percentile data; not intended for clinical scenarios requiring evaluation of the number of white matter hyperintensities.

Overview status: Source-reviewed overview

Clinical takeaway

Clinical role: Automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from MR images, with comparison to reference percentile data; not intended for clinical scenarios requiring evaluation of the number of white matter hyperintensities.

Evidence takeaway

Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA performance testing included software verification, validation, human-factors testing, literature-based validation studies stated in the submission, and segmentation-accuracy evaluation. For 3D T1 brain structures, Dice coefficients exceeded 85% for whole-brain regions and ranged from 75% to 85% for subcortical structures. Lesion segmentation on paired 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR sequences reported mean absolute volume difference 3.34 mL over lesion loads from 0.09 mL to 87.65 mL. These are segmentation overlap and volume-difference endpoints, not sensitivity or specificity.

Clinical details

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
Automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from MR images, with comparison to reference percentile data; not intended for clinical scenarios requiring evaluation of the number of white matter hyperintensities.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Intended users
Medical personnel or neuroimaging-trained personnel, with review by a trained physician.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Care setting and population
Clinical neuroimaging post-processing workflow; the FDA packet does not specify a facility type.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Workflow role
Post-acquisition DICOM pipeline that retrieves 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR data, performs automated brain and lesion segmentation and quantification, generates a report and overlays, and supports trained-physician review and editing.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Required input
DICOM MRI data with 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR series from patients aged 20 to 90; T1 processing supports 1.5T and 3T scanners and T2 FLAIR processing supports 3T scanners.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Output and human action
Volumetric measurements of brain structures and lesions, segmented color overlays, electronic morphometric/PDF reports, comparisons with a healthy reference population and prior scans when available, and DICOM output viewable on DICOM workstations and PACS.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Limitations
The intended use excludes clinical scenarios requiring evaluation of the number of white matter hyperintensities. The described input population is ages 20-90 with specified T1/T2 FLAIR protocols and field strengths, and results must be reviewed by a trained physician. The packet supports Linux and off-the-shelf hardware but does not establish every scanner or local configuration.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K192531
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
MRI
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Anatomy
Brain structures and lesions, including grey matter, white matter, hippocampus, amygdala, and white matter hyperintensities
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Clearance type
510(k)
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2019-12-13
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
The software retrieves DICOM MRI data from a DICOM server, sends it to an analysis server, and supports DICOM output for DICOM workstations and PACS; it also states integration with leading RIS/PACS systems without establishing a specific product, version, or local compatibility.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Deployment and data flow
On-premise
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-13

Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.

Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
  • Vendor confirmation
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.

Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
  • Vendor confirmation
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.

Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
  • Vendor confirmation
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.

Input or output interoperability

DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-01

The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.

Supported acquisition environment

Scanner manufacturers: All

exact submission · checked 2026-09-01

Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.

ACR exact-submission catalog context

ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for QyScore Software; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-09

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.

Evidence summary
FDA performance testing included software verification, validation, human-factors testing, literature-based validation studies stated in the submission, and segmentation-accuracy evaluation. For 3D T1 brain structures, Dice coefficients exceeded 85% for whole-brain regions and ranged from 75% to 85% for subcortical structures. Lesion segmentation on paired 3D T1 and T2 FLAIR sequences reported mean absolute volume difference 3.34 mL over lesion loads from 0.09 mL to 87.65 mL. These are segmentation overlap and volume-difference endpoints, not sensitivity or specificity.
  • FDA source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09
Reported sensitivity
Research pending
  • Needs research
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31

This field has not been curated yet.

Reported specificity
Research pending
  • Needs research
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-08-31

This field has not been curated yet.

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

QyScore Software regulatory performance study summary

  • DesignStand-Alone Performance
  • PopulationAdult
  • Scopeexact submission
  • Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K192531
  • IndependenceIndependence not established

K192531

ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.

Costs and setup

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
  • Vendor confirmation
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

No public price or quote for the exact K192531 configuration was established in this review.

Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
  • Reviewed sources checked
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K192531. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
  • Public source
  • Exact FDA submission
  • Checked 2026-09-09

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
24Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
2Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

The refreshed discovery snapshot contains 2 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Discovery metadata alone does not establish exact tested-product, version, population, and endpoint applicability, so all candidates remain quarantined and none was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 2 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources & history

How this profile was documented

Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.

View source ledger and history

Source ledger

  1. FDA K192531: QyScore Software

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Published 2019-12-13 - Accessed 2026-09-09

    Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation

  2. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Medical Devices

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-08-31

    Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext

  3. QyScore Software model card (K192531)

    American College of Radiology - Published 2026-08-17 - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: intendedUsers, careSetting, output, limitations, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities

  4. PubMed biomedical literature index

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery

  5. ClinicalTrials.gov study registry

    U.S. National Library of Medicine - Accessed 2026-09-01

    Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus

  6. openFDA Device Recall API

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-09-02

    Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching

  7. openFDA exact recall query for K192531

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration - Accessed 2026-09-09

    Scope: postmarketSafety

Research history

  1. K192531 FDA decision

    Regulatory record

    510(k)

  2. Source-review record updated

    Research record

    fda record reviewed

  3. Reader overview source-reviewed

    Editorial review

    Source-reviewed editorial overlay

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K261405

ANDI 2.2

Imeka Solutions, Inc.

ANDI 2.2 processes brain MR images for atlas-assisted visualization, segmentation and volumetric quantification, presenting adjunctive DICOM-readable information for trained...

Modality
MRI
Anatomy
Brain
Decision
2026-05-28
FDA-cleared K261273

Neurophet AQUA

Neurophet., Inc.

Neurophet AQUA is intended for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images; volumetric...

Modality
MRI
Anatomy
Brain; segmentable structures and lesions
Decision
2026-05-15
FDA-cleared K260032

Morph

BeauBrain Healthcare, Inc.

Morph automatically labels, visualizes, and volumetrically quantifies segmentable brain structures from MR images and may compare measurements with reference percentile data; it...

Modality
MRI
Anatomy
Brain
Decision
2026-05-13
FDA-cleared K254015

CoLumbo C-Spine

Smart Soft Healthcare AD

Post-process previously acquired cervical-spine MR images to segment vertebrae and disks, calculate quantitative measurements, label out-of-range values, and export results for...

Modality
MRI
Anatomy
Cervical spine: vertebrae C3-C7 and disks C2C3 through C7T1
Decision
2026-04-01