NeuroICH is a notification-only, parallel workflow tool for use by hospital networks and trained clinicians to identify and communicate images of suspected ICH patients to a specialist, independent of standard of care workflow. The device uses an artificial intelligence algorithm to analyze non-contrast CT images of the head acquired in the acute setting for findings suggestive of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in parallel to the ongoing standard of care image interpretation and notify an appropriate clinician of these findings. Notifications include non-diagnostic preview images that are meant for informational purposes only. The device does not alter or remove the original medical image and is not intended to be used as a diagnostic device. Images can be previewed through a mobile application. Notified clinicians are responsible for viewing high quality images on a diagnostic viewer per the standard of care and engaging in appropriate patient evaluation in conjunction with other patient information before making care-related decisions. NeuroICH is limited to analysis of imaging data and should not be used in-lieu of full patient evaluation or relied upon to make or confirm diagnosis.
Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
NeuroICH is a notification-only, parallel workflow tool for use by hospital networks and trained clinicians to identify and communicate images of suspected ICH patients to a specialist, independent of standard of care workflow. The device uses an artificial intelligence algorithm to analyze non-contrast CT images of the head acquired in the acute setting for findings suggestive of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in parallel to the ongoing standard of care image interpretation and notify an appropriate clinician of these findings. Notifications include non-diagnostic preview images that are meant for informational purposes only. The device does not alter or remove the original medical image and is not intended to be used as a diagnostic device. Images can be previewed through a mobile application. Notified clinicians are responsible for viewing high quality images on a diagnostic viewer per the standard of care and engaging in appropriate patient evaluation in conjunction with other patient information before making care-related decisions. NeuroICH is limited to analysis of imaging data and should not be used in-lieu of full patient evaluation or relied upon to make or confirm diagnosis.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Exact-submission indication text from the ACR AI Central model card. FDA labeling remains controlling.
CT images or data. Inclusion criteria: Non-contrast CT (NCCT) images of the head acquired in the acute setting from patients undergoing stroke protocol, analyzed for features indicative of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
The AI model outputs a binary classification of suspected ICH present or absent in non-contrast head CT scans. Upon detection of suspected ICH, the device sends a push notification along with non-diagnostic preview images to a mobile application to alert a specialist clinician. The device identifies ICH subtypes including extradural, subdural, subarachnoid, intraparenchymal, and intraventricular hemorrhages. The output is for informational/notification purposes only and is not intended for diagnostic use.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01
Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.
Regulatory identity
FDA record and catalog context
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K241719
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Standards-based DICOM/PACS integration was identified in the FDA submission materials; compatibility with a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, or orchestrator requires confirmation.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Evidence
Performance evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
NeuroICH regulatory performance study summary
Stand-Alone Performance · Population described in the exact-submission ACR model card
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K241719 · n=376 · Independence not established
K241719
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify care setting and population: Confirm the intended care setting, patient population, and service line.
Verify limitations: Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.
Verify security and privacy controls: FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-04Last searched
17Fields reviewed
6Source classes checked
0Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
CINA analyzes nonenhanced head CT for suspected intracranial hemorrhage and head CTA for suspected large-vessel occlusion for computer-aided triage and notification in parallel...
FDA product code QAS identifies this device class as Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage And Notification Software. Radiological computer-assisted triage and notification...
FDA product code QAS identifies this device class as Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage And Notification Software. Radiological computer-assisted triage and notification...
FDA product code QAS identifies this device class as Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage And Notification Software. Radiological computer-assisted triage and notification...