Authorized purpose: Notification-only triage for suspected acute intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT, sharing cases with medical specialists in parallel with standard care.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Notification-only triage for suspected acute intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT, sharing cases with medical specialists in parallel with standard care.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Notification-only triage for suspected acute intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT, sharing cases with medical specialists in parallel with standard care.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: CT/CTA Anatomy or clinical context: Brain Input: DICOM non-contrast head CT images. The FDA packet states a contraindication for analyzing otherwise eligible non-contrast CT scans acquired on scanners from manufacturers other than General Electric or its subsidiaries.
Who uses it?Intended users: Radiologists, emergency-medicine physicians, neurosurgeons, neurologists, and other trained clinicians or medical specialists.
What does the software produce?Output: A binary suspected-ICH or case-processed result, no image marking, and a non-diagnostic preview or notification delivered through the worklist, PACS/workstation, or mobile application for specialist review.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: Notification and preview are not diagnostic and cannot substitute for full patient assessment or diagnostic-viewer interpretation. The packet states a GE-scanner contraindication for otherwise eligible non-contrast CT and requires specialist review; exact current deployment, security, and interface versions are not established.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Notification-only triage for suspected acute intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT, sharing cases with medical specialists in parallel with standard care.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA retrospective testing used 394 brain CT images from 13 U.S. clinical sites, including 198 ICH-positive and 196 ICH-negative images, with ground truth established by trained neuro-radiologists and a reference-standard committee. Subject sensitivity was 95.45% (95% CI 91.55%-97.90%), specificity was 98.47% (95% CI 95.59%-99.68%), AUC was 0.9864 (95% CI 0.9738-0.9989), and mean time to notification was 16.39 +/- 5.46 seconds. The pre-specified sensitivity and specificity performance goal was 80%.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Notification-only triage for suspected acute intracranial hemorrhage on non-contrast brain CT, sharing cases with medical specialists in parallel with standard care.
Parallel notification and worklist-prioritization tool; returns suspected ICH or case-processed status to a PACS/workstation and mobile preview workflow while the specialist performs full diagnostic interpretation.
DICOM non-contrast head CT images. The FDA packet states a contraindication for analyzing otherwise eligible non-contrast CT scans acquired on scanners from manufacturers other than General Electric or its subsidiaries.
A binary suspected-ICH or case-processed result, no image marking, and a non-diagnostic preview or notification delivered through the worklist, PACS/workstation, or mobile application for specialist review.
Notification and preview are not diagnostic and cannot substitute for full patient assessment or diagnostic-viewer interpretation. The packet states a GE-scanner contraindication for otherwise eligible non-contrast CT and requires specialist review; exact current deployment, security, and interface versions are not established.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
A third-party worklist application receives analysis requests and DICOM images and receives the ICH finding back for radiologist alerts; the comparison table identifies DICOM compatibility, PACS/workstation results, and mobile non-diagnostic preview.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for Hyper Insight - ICH; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA retrospective testing used 394 brain CT images from 13 U.S. clinical sites, including 198 ICH-positive and 196 ICH-negative images, with ground truth established by trained neuro-radiologists and a reference-standard committee. Subject sensitivity was 95.45% (95% CI 91.55%-97.90%), specificity was 98.47% (95% CI 95.59%-99.68%), AUC was 0.9864 (95% CI 0.9738-0.9989), and mean time to notification was 16.39 +/- 5.46 seconds. The pre-specified sensitivity and specificity performance goal was 80%.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Hyper Insight - ICH regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationPopulation described in the exact-submission ACR model card
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K240353
Samplen=394
Sites13
IndependenceIndependence not established
K240353
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K240353 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K240353. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K240353 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
24Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Methinks CTA Stroke analyzes acute-setting brain CT angiography in adults over 21 with suspected stroke for suspected large-vessel occlusion in the terminal ICA, MCA-M1, or MCA-M2...
Rapid CTA 360 analyzes adult head CTA DICOM images to flag suspected large- and medium-vessel occlusion in specified intracranial and vertebral segments and notify trained...
Methinks NCCT Stroke analyzes adult non-contrast head CT to flag suspected intracranial hemorrhage and suspected large-vessel occlusion of the ICA, MCA-M1, or MCA-M2 for parallel...