Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
FDA-cleared profile
SK Inc.
Hyper Insight - ICH is a notification-only workflow tool for trained clinicians to identify patients' brain CT images and share them with medical specialists in parallel with standard patient care workflow. Hyper Insight - ICH uses deep learning-based Al algorithms to analyze images to find suspected intracranial hemorrhage and notifies and shares the findings to medical specialists. Identification of images with suspected intracranial hemorrhage is for notification purposes only, not diagnostic purposes. In particular, this medical device analyzes non-contrast brain CT images, and if a suspected intracranial hemorrhage is identified, it sends a notification to medical specialists, who are advised to review these images. Images may be previewed through the mobile app but are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for diagnostic purposes other than notifications and previews. The medical specialist who received the notification is responsible for reading the image in a diagnostic viewer. Hyper Insight - ICH is limited to the purpose of analysis of image data and should not be used as a substitute for a full patient assessment or relied upon to make or confirm a diagnosis.
Clinical fit
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact-submission indication text from the ACR AI Central model card. FDA labeling remains controlling.
Intended-user text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Confirm the intended care setting, patient population, and service line.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Imaging modality reported in the exact-submission ACR AI Central model card.
Anatomy normalized from explicit exact-submission ACR model-card wording.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
PACS and workstation are explicitly referenced as a result destination.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm supported products, versions, routing behavior, and display requirements during local evaluation.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Structured study metadata from the exact-submission ACR model card; this is not an independent evidence synthesis.
Model sensitivity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
Model specificity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Stand-Alone Performance · Population described in the exact-submission ACR model card
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K240353 · n=394 · 13 sites · Independence not establishedK240353
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Economics and lifecycle
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources
Sources accessed through 2026-09-02.
Alternatives
AVICENNA.AI
CINA analyzes nonenhanced head CT for suspected intracranial hemorrhage and head CTA for suspected large-vessel occlusion for computer-aided triage and notification in parallel...
Mlhealth 360
FDA product code QAS identifies this device class as Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage And Notification Software. Radiological computer-assisted triage and notification...
Brainomix Limited
FDA product code QAS identifies this device class as Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage And Notification Software. Radiological computer-assisted triage and notification...
Methinks Software S.L.
FDA product code QAS identifies this device class as Radiological Computer-Assisted Triage And Notification Software. Radiological computer-assisted triage and notification...