Authorized purpose: Post-processing automatic segmentation, quantification, and reporting of brain FLAIR hyperintensity volumes to support structural MRI review; not disease detection or diagnosis.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Post-processing automatic segmentation, quantification, and reporting of brain FLAIR hyperintensity volumes to support structural MRI review; not disease detection or diagnosis.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Post-processing automatic segmentation, quantification, and reporting of brain FLAIR hyperintensity volumes to support structural MRI review; not disease detection or diagnosis.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: MRI Anatomy or clinical context: Adult brain, specifically T2-weighted FLAIR hyperintensities Input: T2-weighted FLAIR brain MR images in DICOM format from an MRI scanner or PACS; the labeled population is adults only.
Who uses it?Intended users: Radiologists, imaging professionals, and other clinicians working with radiological images; trained technical personnel install the software
What does the software produce?Output: Segmentation overlays on a new secondary-capture image series, total hyperintensity volume measurements, a DICOM Encapsulated PDF, and a DICOM Structured Report, viewable on DICOM workstations and PACS.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: Contraindicated for pediatric patients and patients who have undergone brain-tumor or other resection surgery. It is not intended for detection or specific diagnosis of disease or for detection of signal hyperintensities, must not replace full MRI evaluation, and leaves final management decisions to the physician.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Post-processing automatic segmentation, quantification, and reporting of brain FLAIR hyperintensity volumes to support structural MRI review; not disease detection or diagnosis.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA packet: performance testing compared automated hyperintensity segmentations with STAPLE consensus from expert-labeled segmentations, using OLS regression and Dice similarity for volume and overlap agreement across scanner manufacturers and field strengths. The packet states that planned acceptance criteria passed but discloses no numerical performance values or case count in this submission.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Post-processing automatic segmentation, quantification, and reporting of brain FLAIR hyperintensity volumes to support structural MRI review; not disease detection or diagnosis.
Segmentation overlays on a new secondary-capture image series, total hyperintensity volume measurements, a DICOM Encapsulated PDF, and a DICOM Structured Report, viewable on DICOM workstations and PACS.
Contraindicated for pediatric patients and patients who have undergone brain-tumor or other resection surgery. It is not intended for detection or specific diagnosis of disease or for detection of signal hyperintensities, must not replace full MRI evaluation, and leaves final management decisions to the physician.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Packaged as a computing appliance supporting DICOM file transfer for input and output, with no user interface required after installation; processing errors are reported in the output series or system logs, and outputs are designed for third-party DICOM workstations and PACS. Installation is by trained technical personnel; exact interface versions are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
ACR exact-submission catalog context
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for GBrain MRI; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA packet: performance testing compared automated hyperintensity segmentations with STAPLE consensus from expert-labeled segmentations, using OLS regression and Dice similarity for volume and overlap agreement across scanner manufacturers and field strengths. The packet states that planned acceptance criteria passed but discloses no numerical performance values or case count in this submission.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
GBrain MRI regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K250416
IndependenceIndependence not established
K250416
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K250416 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K250416. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K250416 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
23Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Post-processing segmentation, quantification, and reporting of brain signal hyperintensities on T2w FLAIR and T1w post-contrast MRI; not detection or specific disease diagnosis.
MRCP+v1 is indicated for use as a software-based image processing system for non-invasive, quantitative assessment of biliary system structures by facilitating the generation,...
ANDI 2.2 processes brain MR images for atlas-assisted visualization, segmentation and volumetric quantification, presenting adjunctive DICOM-readable information for trained...
Neurophet AQUA is intended for automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of segmentable brain structures and lesions from a set of MR images; volumetric...