Authorized purpose: EFAI HCAPSeg assists trained radiation-oncology professionals with radiation-treatment planning by providing initial deep-learning contours of organs at risk on non-contrast CT images for transfer to a DICOM-compliant treatment-planning system.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: EFAI HCAPSeg assists trained radiation-oncology professionals with radiation-treatment planning by providing initial deep-learning contours of organs at risk on non-contrast CT images for transfer to a DICOM-compliant treatment-planning system.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: EFAI HCAPSeg assists trained radiation-oncology professionals with radiation-treatment planning by providing initial deep-learning contours of organs at risk on non-contrast CT images for transfer to a DICOM-compliant treatment-planning system.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: Radiotherapy Planning Imaging Anatomy or clinical context: Adult organs at risk on non-contrast CT during radiation-treatment planning Input: Supported CT, MR, PET, or other DICOM image data, structures, prescriptions, and treatment-planning inputs within the exact submission.
Who uses it?Intended users: Radiation oncologists, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and other trained radiation-treatment professionals.
What does the software produce?Output: Contours, registered images, dose distributions, plans, measurements, or exported treatment-planning objects for professional review and approval.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: Automated contours, plans, registrations, dose values, or other outputs require qualified review, editing, commissioning, and local validation before clinical use.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: EFAI HCAPSeg assists trained radiation-oncology professionals with radiation-treatment planning by providing initial deep-learning contours of organs at risk on non-contrast CT images for transfer to a DICOM-compliant treatment-planning system.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: The exact FDA decision material for K231928 supports the submission-specific intended use and regulatory verification summarized here; it does not establish a general product-wide sensitivity or specificity value.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
EFAI HCAPSeg assists trained radiation-oncology professionals with radiation-treatment planning by providing initial deep-learning contours of organs at risk on non-contrast CT images for transfer to a DICOM-compliant treatment-planning system.
Automated contours, plans, registrations, dose values, or other outputs require qualified review, editing, commissioning, and local validation before clinical use.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Standards-based DICOM/PACS integration was identified in the FDA submission materials; compatibility with a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, or orchestrator requires confirmation.
Public source
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-08-13
Normalized from the prior exact-submission review. Confirm interface versions and local compatibility during technical evaluation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
Public sources reviewed here do not establish the complete exact-release security posture, including identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote access, vulnerability management, backup, or incident response.
Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-08-13
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-08-13
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Workflow role
Radiation-treatment planning, image registration, contouring, dose calculation, or plan review support under qualified professional control.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-04
Submission-anchored workflow summary, not a local acceptance or deployment result.
Current vendor material is product-family context for K231928 only; exact release, enabled options, deployment, security, interoperability, pricing, and local workflow require confirmation.
product family · checked 2026-09-04
Vendor material is not exact-release evidence unless that linkage is separately proven.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
The exact FDA decision material for K231928 supports the submission-specific intended use and regulatory verification summarized here; it does not establish a general product-wide sensitivity or specificity value.
No exact-submission and version-linked sensitivity endpoint is promoted; candidate or product-family values were not substituted.
Reported specificity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-04
No exact-submission and version-linked specificity endpoint is promoted; candidate or product-family values were not substituted.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
FDA submission-specific verification and validation evidence for K231928
DesignFDA 510(k) regulatory decision material and submission-specific verification or validation evidence for K231928; this is regulatory evidence, not an independent clinical effectiveness study.
PopulationThe labeled population, anatomy, images, and test materials described in the exact FDA decision material for K231928; a broader clinical population is not established here.
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionEFAI RTSUITE CT HCAP-Segmentation System (K231928)
IndependenceSponsor or vendor study
K231928
The exact FDA material is submission-specific and should not be generalized to other versions, enabled options, sites, protocols, or clinical outcomes.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-04
No public exact-release price, license fee, subscription, contract, or implementation cost was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Checked 2026-09-04
CMS coverage-index context was checked, but no product-specific coverage or reimbursement determination is inferred.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-04
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Open questions to take to the vendor
Verify security and privacy controls: Public sources reviewed here do not establish the complete exact-release security posture, including identity, audit, encryption, retention, remote access, vulnerability management, backup, or incident response.
Verify training: Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public exact-release price, license fee, subscription, contract, or implementation cost was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: CMS coverage-index context was checked, but no product-specific coverage or reimbursement determination is inferred.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
Verify recalls and postmarket safety signals: No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
31Fields reviewed
13Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, vendor product page, implementation documentation, reimbursement policy, peer reviewed literature, clinical trial registry, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history8 sources - 3 history items
DeepBT Detector-Plus provides initial gross-tumor-volume contours on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and optional T2-weighted MR images for radiation-treatment planning in adults...
Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
Brain tumors, including metastases, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas
syngo.via RT Image Suite VC10 provides three-dimensional and four-dimensional multimodality visualization, registration, fusion, contouring, and planning support for...
Modality
Radiotherapy Planning Imaging
Anatomy
Brain, pelvis, thorax, abdomen, targets, organs at risk, and moving tumors or organs
The EMLA family delivers external-beam radiation therapy for adult and pediatric patients with benign, malignant, or metastatic disease. Authorized techniques vary by model:...