Authorized purpose: Case-level prioritization and passive notification for adult non-contrast head CT studies with features suggestive of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); not a stand-alone diagnostic or rule-out tool.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Case-level prioritization and passive notification for adult non-contrast head CT studies with features suggestive of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); not a stand-alone diagnostic or rule-out tool.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Case-level prioritization and passive notification for adult non-contrast head CT studies with features suggestive of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); not a stand-alone diagnostic or rule-out tool.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: CT/CTA Anatomy or clinical context: Brain/head Input: DICOM-compliant adult non-contrast head CT studies with features suggestive of acute ICH.
Who uses it?Intended users: Radiologists and trained clinicians.
What does the software produce?Output: Binary case-level 'Suspected ICH: Yes or No' output to a PACS/workstation for worklist prioritization or triage; the device does not mark, highlight, or direct attention to a specific image location.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: Not intended to address anomalies other than acute ICH, direct attention to image portions, provide stand-alone clinical decision-making, rule out hemorrhage, or preclude assessment of the CT study; full clinical review remains required.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Case-level prioritization and passive notification for adult non-contrast head CT studies with features suggestive of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); not a stand-alone diagnostic or rule-out tool.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA packet: retrospective, blinded, multisite validation of 288 CT studies (132 ICH positive, 156 negative) from 23 U.S. clinical sites, with three U.S. board-certified neuroradiologists and majority ground truth; the lower bounds of both 95% CIs were required to exceed 0.8. Standalone sensitivity was 0.947 (95% CI 0.895-0.974), specificity 0.949 (0.902-0.974), AUROC 0.983 (0.969-0.997), and mean processing time 34.96 seconds (33.89-36.03). Subgroup analyses covered demographic, manufacturer, slice-thickness, and ICH-type groups without replacing the overall endpoints.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Case-level prioritization and passive notification for adult non-contrast head CT studies with features suggestive of acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); not a stand-alone diagnostic or rule-out tool.
Binary case-level 'Suspected ICH: Yes or No' output to a PACS/workstation for worklist prioritization or triage; the device does not mark, highlight, or direct attention to a specific image location.
Not intended to address anomalies other than acute ICH, direct attention to image portions, provide stand-alone clinical decision-making, rule out hemorrhage, or preclude assessment of the CT study; full clinical review remains required.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The FDA packet describes DICOM-compliant input and case-level output to a PACS/workstation; exact interface versions, routing behavior, and local compatibility are not established.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for EFAI NeuroSuite CT ICH Assessment System; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA packet: retrospective, blinded, multisite validation of 288 CT studies (132 ICH positive, 156 negative) from 23 U.S. clinical sites, with three U.S. board-certified neuroradiologists and majority ground truth; the lower bounds of both 95% CIs were required to exceed 0.8. Standalone sensitivity was 0.947 (95% CI 0.895-0.974), specificity 0.949 (0.902-0.974), AUROC 0.983 (0.969-0.997), and mean processing time 34.96 seconds (33.89-36.03). Subgroup analyses covered demographic, manufacturer, slice-thickness, and ICH-type groups without replacing the overall endpoints.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
EFAI NeuroSuite CT ICH Assessment System regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K231025
Samplen=288
Sites23
IndependenceIndependence not established
K231025
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K231025 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K231025. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify deployment and data flow: The reviewed sources do not establish the current exact-release hosting topology, data flow, region, tenancy, or disaster-recovery configuration.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K231025 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
25Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Study-level triage and prioritization notification for suspected mass effect on non-contrast brain CT in patients aged 22 years and older; not a stand-alone decision or rule-out...
Notification-only triage of adult non-contrast head CT for suspected intracranial hemorrhage and large-vessel occlusion, with parallel communication to trained clinicians during...
Modality
CT/CTA
Anatomy
Brain and intracranial vessels: intracranial hemorrhage and LVO involving ICA, MCA-M1, and MCA-M2