Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
FDA-cleared profile
Ever Fortune.AI, Co., Ltd.
EFAI CARDIOSUITE CTA ACUTE AORTIC SYNDROME ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (EFAI AASCTA) is a radiological computer aided triage and notification software indicated for use in the analysis of chest or chest-abdomen CTA in adults aged 22 and older. The device is intended to assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in workflow triage by flagging and communicating suspected positive cases of aortic dissection (AD) or aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) pathology. EFAI AASCTA uses an artificial intelligence algorithm to identify suspected findings. It makes case-level output available to a PACS/workstation for worklist prioritization or triage. BFAI AASCTA is not intended to direct attention to specific portions or anomalies of an image. Its results are not intended to be used on a stand-alone basis for clinical decision- making nor is it intended to rule out AAS or otherwise preclude clinical assessment of computed tomography angiography cases.
Clinical fit
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact-submission indication text from the ACR AI Central model card. FDA labeling remains controlling.
Intended-user text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Patient-population text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; institutional setting may still require vendor confirmation.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.
Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Imaging modality reported in the exact-submission ACR AI Central model card.
Anatomy normalized from explicit exact-submission ACR model-card wording.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.
Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.
Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
PACS and workstation are explicitly referenced as a result destination.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm supported products, versions, routing behavior, and display requirements during local evaluation.
Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Structured study metadata from the exact-submission ACR model card; this is not an independent evidence synthesis.
Model sensitivity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
Model specificity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
Stand-Alone Performance · Adult
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K240291 · n=380 · Independence not establishedK240291
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Economics and lifecycle
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.
Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources
Sources accessed through 2026-09-02.
Alternatives
Elucid Bioimaging Inc.
vascuCAP analyzes contrast multidetector CT of arterial vessels to support atherosclerosis stratification with color maps, three-dimensional views, multiplanar reformats, and...
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
An extension for syngo.via that assists trained physicians with automated and semi-automated analysis, visualization and reporting of cardiac CT angiography volume datasets for...
Keya Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
Coronary plaque and stenosis quantification from CCTA
Canon Medical Informatics, Inc.
FDA product code QIH identifies this device class as Automated Radiological Image Processing Software. To provide automated radiological image processing and analysis tools....