EFAI CARDIOSUITE CTA ACUTE AORTIC SYNDROME ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
Ever Fortune.AI, Co., Ltd.
Authorized purpose: Assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in triaging adults aged 22 years and older by flagging suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma on chest or chest-abdomen CTA.
Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in triaging adults aged 22 years and older by flagging suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma on chest or chest-abdomen CTA.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in triaging adults aged 22 years and older by flagging suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma on chest or chest-abdomen CTA.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: CT/CTA Anatomy or clinical context: Chest, abdomen, and thoracoabdominal aorta Input: DICOM chest or chest-abdomen CTA studies from adults aged 22 years and older; the FDA validation set included 380 CTA studies with 156 positive and 224 negative cases.
Who uses it?Intended users: Hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists
What does the software produce?Output: Case-level passive notification or flag to a PACS/workstation indicating suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma; the device does not mark, highlight, or direct attention to a specific image location.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: The output is for worklist prioritization or triage, not standalone clinical decision-making. It is not intended to rule out acute aortic syndrome or preclude clinical assessment of CTA cases, and it does not provide lesion marking or location-specific guidance.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in triaging adults aged 22 years and older by flagging suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma on chest or chest-abdomen CTA.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA K240291 reports a retrospective, blinded, multisite validation of 380 consecutively collected US CTA studies, including 156 positives and 224 negatives, independent of model development and analytical validation. Three US board-certified radiologists established ground truth by majority agreement. Sensitivity was 0.929 (95% CI 0.878-0.960) and specificity was 0.915 (95% CI 0.871-0.945). The secondary system-processing endpoint was 37.86 seconds per study (95% CI 35.22-40.50).
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in triaging adults aged 22 years and older by flagging suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma on chest or chest-abdomen CTA.
Notification-only parallel triage and worklist prioritization; the device flags cases for earlier review without marking a location or replacing clinical assessment.
DICOM chest or chest-abdomen CTA studies from adults aged 22 years and older; the FDA validation set included 380 CTA studies with 156 positive and 224 negative cases.
Case-level passive notification or flag to a PACS/workstation indicating suspected aortic dissection or aortic intramural hematoma; the device does not mark, highlight, or direct attention to a specific image location.
The output is for worklist prioritization or triage, not standalone clinical decision-making. It is not intended to rule out acute aortic syndrome or preclude clinical assessment of CTA cases, and it does not provide lesion marking or location-specific guidance.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
The packet describes DICOM input and passive output to a PACS/RIS workstation for worklist prioritization or triage. Specific interface versions, current deployment, and local compatibility are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for EFAI CARDIOSUITE CTA ACUTE AORTIC SYNDROME ASSESSMENT SYSTEM; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA K240291 reports a retrospective, blinded, multisite validation of 380 consecutively collected US CTA studies, including 156 positives and 224 negatives, independent of model development and analytical validation. Three US board-certified radiologists established ground truth by majority agreement. Sensitivity was 0.929 (95% CI 0.878-0.960) and specificity was 0.915 (95% CI 0.871-0.945). The secondary system-processing endpoint was 37.86 seconds per study (95% CI 35.22-40.50).
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
EFAI CARDIOSUITE CTA ACUTE AORTIC SYNDROME ASSESSMENT SYSTEM regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K240291
Samplen=380
IndependenceIndependence not established
K240291
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K240291 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K240291. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K240291 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
24Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Enhanced Boundary for PCCT is a deep-learning CT processing function for improved soft-tissue delineation in routine head examinations with or without contrast.
Fibresolve analyzes lung CT in patients with pulmonary symptoms to provide an adjunct diagnostic-subtype classification for suspected interstitial lung disease and support...