Adjunct to diagnostic stress echocardiography for patients undergoing assessment for coronary artery disease; an interpreting physician uses the output as information that may assist diagnosis, not as the sole basis for management.
Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.
Clinical fit
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Adjunct to diagnostic stress echocardiography for patients undergoing assessment for coronary artery disease; an interpreting physician uses the output as information that may assist diagnosis, not as the sole basis for management.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
User-reviewed ROI/contour and machine-learning decision-support/reporting aid for stress echocardiography; it is an adjunct and not for primary diagnosis.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Automatically detected LV endocardial contours reviewed and approved by trained operators, geometric parameters, and a report with a two-level categorical assessment of whether the stress-echo ROIs suggest a higher or lower possibility of significant CAD, defined in the packet as >=70% stenosis in specified coronary segments.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Patient management must not rely solely on the analysis. The packet states that v1.0.2 was not validated in patients with prior CABG and is not intended for mild or moderate myocardial ischemia, coronary-disease localization, myocardial perfusion, myocardial viability, or valve disease.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
FDA submission
K201555
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
DICOM 3.0 input, Windows operation on off-the-shelf hardware, and a report returned to the physician are described; a specific PACS, RIS, EHR, routing interface, or local compatibility configuration is not established.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for EchoGo Pro; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.
Evidence summary
FDA K201555 reports performance testing for reader improvement, inter-operator agreement, and native system performance. The primary reader-performance increase was AUROC difference 0.054 (95% CI 0.032-0.077; p=0.02), exceeding the predicate comparison. Native system AUROC was 0.927, with sensitivity 0.844 (95% CI 0.739-0.950) and specificity 0.927 (95% CI 0.878-0.976). Kendall Tau-B agreement increased from 0.58 (95% CI 0.48-0.69) unaided to 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.93) with EchoGo Pro (p<0.001). AUROC and agreement are distinct from sensitivity and specificity; the reviewed packet text does not state the performance cohort size.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Native EchoGo Pro system sensitivity: 0.844 (95% CI 0.739-0.950) in the FDA performance testing.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
This is a native system endpoint; the primary reader AUROC delta and Kendall Tau-B agreement are separate measures, and the packet text reviewed here does not state the cohort size.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
EchoGo Pro regulatory performance study summary
Stand-Alone Performance · Population described in the exact-submission ACR model card
exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K201555 · Independence not established
K201555
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No public price or quote for the exact K201555 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K201555. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-09
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K201555 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-09Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
3Unreviewed PubMed leads
1Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Exact FDA scope controls clinical claims. ACR provides bounded exact-submission catalog context. Candidate literature metadata remains a discovery queue until full-text identity, endpoint, population, and version review is completed. Automated exact-name discovery found 3 PubMed and 1 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Alturion Series diagnostic ultrasound systems acquire and display ultrasound images and fluid-flow information for the labeled fetal, abdominal, cardiac, cephalic, obstetric,...
Modality
Ultrasound
Anatomy
Fetus; abdomen; pelvis; small organs; head; heart; peripheral vessels; musculoskeletal anatomy; ophthalmic; urologic organs; and lung
WatchMate Software v1.2.0 processes transesophageal echocardiography data to reconstruct the left atrial appendage and assist preprocedural planning and device sizing during...
Guides medical professionals acquiring ten standard 2D transthoracic echocardiographic views in adults requiring a cardiac ultrasound examination; acquired images require...