Input or output interoperability
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
FDA-cleared profile
ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.
Authorized purpose: Automatically labels, visualizes, and quantifies the volume and shape of segmentable brain structures from MR images.
Product overview
Authorized purpose: Automatically labels, visualizes, and quantifies the volume and shape of segmentable brain structures from MR images.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
Clinical role: Automatically labels, visualizes, and quantifies the volume and shape of segmentable brain structures from MR images.
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA summary reports validation in 101 subjects across 21 structures, with Dice and relative-volume acceptance criteria; third-ventricle mean Dice was below 0.70, and repeat-scan reproducibility was under 10% in the 20Repeat set.
Clinical details
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Clinical-use display mirrors the exact FDA-supported purpose reconciled in this remediation finding.
FDA packet intended-user statement.
Confirm the intended care setting, patient population, and service line.
Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.
FDA device description and comparison table.
FDA device description.
Packet states the segmentable-structure and T1-weighted scope but no broader limitation list.
Regulatory identity
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Implementation
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.
The reviewed sources do not establish the current exact-release hosting topology, data flow, region, tenancy, or disaster-recovery configuration.
Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.
Scanner manufacturers: All
exact submission · checked 2026-09-01Confirm currently supported software versions, protocols, and site-specific acquisition configurations.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for ClearPoint Maestro Brain Model; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
exact submission · checked 2026-09-09Evidence
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Submission-reported segmentation validation; not a general clinical-outcomes claim.
This field has not been curated yet.
This field has not been curated yet.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
K213645
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
Costs and setup
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
No public price or quote for the exact K213645 configuration was established in this review.
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Buyer worksheet
Research record
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, fda decision summary packet, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
Scope: identity, clinicalUse, modality, anatomy, workflow, evidence, implementation, purpose, intendedUsers, input, output, limitations, evidenceSummary
Scope: regulatoryIdentity, modalityContext
Scope: intendedUsers, output, limitations, evidenceSummary, integration, anatomy, evidenceStudies, implementationCapabilities
Scope: evidenceDiscovery
Scope: evidenceDiscovery, studyStatus
Scope: recallDiscovery, nativeSubmissionMatching
Scope: postmarketSafety
Regulatory record
510(k)
Research record
fda record reviewed
Editorial review
Source-reviewed editorial overlay
Alternatives
Imeka Solutions, Inc.
ANDI 2.2 processes brain MR images for atlas-assisted visualization, segmentation and volumetric quantification, presenting adjunctive DICOM-readable information for trained...
BeauBrain Healthcare, Inc.
Morph automatically labels, visualizes, and volumetrically quantifies segmentable brain structures from MR images and may compare measurements with reference percentile data; it...
Siemens Healthcare GmbH
Brain MRI morphometry and white matter hyperintensity quantification, including normative comparison and longitudinal change assessment for clinician review.
Imeka Solutions, Inc.
Adjunctive quantitative brain MRI analysis that compares patient measures with normative and longitudinal references; a physician reviews all results and makes the clinical...