Evidence status: each field states its source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established, and vendor documentation pending remain distinct outcomes.
Product overview
Start with the essentials
Authorized purpose: Automatic standard-view classification, frame extraction, and acquisition-protocol assessment during second- or third-trimester fetal ultrasound.
Overview status: Source-reviewed overview
What does this software do?Authorized purpose: Automatic standard-view classification, frame extraction, and acquisition-protocol assessment during second- or third-trimester fetal ultrasound.
Which images or clinical context are in scope?Modality: Ultrasound Anatomy or clinical context: Fetal heart and abdomen standard views during fetal anatomic ultrasound Input: Fetal 2D ultrasound images and video clips from transabdominal probes during second- or third-trimester examinations, at 18 weeks of gestation or later, for pregnant women aged 18 or older and single pregnancies.
Who uses it?Intended users: Qualified, trained healthcare professionals in a professional prenatal ultrasound environment, including sonographers, MFMs, OB/GYNs, and fetal surgeons
What does the software produce?Output: Automatic classification of fetal heart and abdomen standard views, extracted example frames from video clips, acquisition-protocol assessment, and annotated DICOM files displayed in a DICOM viewer with optional web-interface display; generated annotated DICOM files cannot be modified by the user.
What is its most important limitation?Key limitation: Not intended for multiple pregnancies. The packet limits intended/validated use to transabdominal examinations at 18 weeks of gestation or later and to General Electric, Philips, Samsung, and Siemens ultrasound devices; standard-view classification is not a disease-detection endpoint.
Clinical takeaway
Clinical role: Automatic standard-view classification, frame extraction, and acquisition-protocol assessment during second- or third-trimester fetal ultrasound.
Evidence takeaway
Evidence from the reviewed source record: FDA bench validation used 2,290 clinically acquired images and video frames from 579 fetal ultrasound examinations at 18 weeks of gestation or later, from eight centers. A sonographer and an MFM specialist independently established the standard-view reference. Mean standard-view recognition sensitivity was 0.939 (95% CI 0.917-0.960) and specificity was 0.984 (95% CI 0.973-0.996). Validation used GE, Philips, Samsung, and Siemens ultrasound devices and separate training and testing examinations.
Clinical details
What this tool is for
Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.
Exact purpose
Automatic standard-view classification, frame extraction, and acquisition-protocol assessment during second- or third-trimester fetal ultrasound.
Qualified, trained healthcare professionals in a professional prenatal ultrasound environment, including sonographers, MFMs, OB/GYNs, and fetal surgeons
Acquisition and interpretation support: classifies standard views, extracts representative frames, and assesses whether documented views satisfy a center-defined acquisition protocol.
Fetal 2D ultrasound images and video clips from transabdominal probes during second- or third-trimester examinations, at 18 weeks of gestation or later, for pregnant women aged 18 or older and single pregnancies.
Automatic classification of fetal heart and abdomen standard views, extracted example frames from video clips, acquisition-protocol assessment, and annotated DICOM files displayed in a DICOM viewer with optional web-interface display; generated annotated DICOM files cannot be modified by the user.
Not intended for multiple pregnancies. The packet limits intended/validated use to transabdominal examinations at 18 weeks of gestation or later and to General Electric, Philips, Samsung, and Siemens ultrasound devices; standard-view classification is not a disease-detection endpoint.
The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.
Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.
Integration
Cloud-based, stand-alone software that operates on DICOM files, displays annotated DICOM outputs in a DICOM viewer, and may also display them in a device web interface. Specific PACS/RIS interfaces and local compatibility are not established.
Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.
ACR AI Central provides an exact-submission model card for BrightHeart View Classifier; FDA labeling remains controlling for clinical use, limitations, and performance.
Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version. Candidate literature without exact product and version linkage is not shown as product evidence.
Evidence summary
FDA bench validation used 2,290 clinically acquired images and video frames from 579 fetal ultrasound examinations at 18 weeks of gestation or later, from eight centers. A sonographer and an MFM specialist independently established the standard-view reference. Mean standard-view recognition sensitivity was 0.939 (95% CI 0.917-0.960) and specificity was 0.984 (95% CI 0.973-0.996). Validation used GE, Philips, Samsung, and Siemens ultrasound devices and separate training and testing examinations.
No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.
BrightHeart View Classifier regulatory performance study summary
DesignStand-Alone Performance
PopulationAdult
Scopeexact submission
Tested versionExact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K251456
Samplen=2290
Sites8
IndependenceIndependence not established
K251456
ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.
These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.
Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No public price or quote for the exact K251456 configuration was established in this review.
Reimbursement and coding
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked
Exact FDA submission
Checked 2026-09-08
No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Safety and lifecycle
Postmarket record
Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.
Postmarket safety review
The exact-identifier FDA recall query returned no native recall record for K251456. This limited result does not establish absence of recalls or other safety information and does not cover later versions, family records, MAUDE reports, corrections, or field notices.
Verify security and privacy controls: Exact-release security controls, data retention, hosting boundaries, and scoped assurance documentation require vendor confirmation.
Verify training: Current training prerequisites, competency checks, and support commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
Verify pricing and total cost: No public price or quote for the exact K251456 configuration was established in this review.
Verify reimbursement and coding relevance: No exact-product payer policy, coding instruction, or payment determination was established; eligibility must be evaluated by payer, site of service, and use case.
Verify local validation and lifecycle monitoring: Current drift, quality, uptime, alert, escalation, and incident-response commitments for the exact configuration require vendor confirmation.
This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.
Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-20Last searched
26Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Screened PubMed leads
0Screened trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads
The refreshed discovery snapshot contains no PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov candidates; no external evidence was promoted. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.
Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.
Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, fda device recall, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall
Sources & history
How this profile was documented
Open the ledger for source dates, scope, and research-record updates.
View source ledger and history7 sources - 3 history items
Alturion Series diagnostic ultrasound systems acquire and display ultrasound images and fluid-flow information for the labeled fetal, abdominal, cardiac, cephalic, obstetric,...
Modality
Ultrasound
Anatomy
Fetus; abdomen; pelvis; small organs; head; heart; peripheral vessels; musculoskeletal anatomy; ophthalmic; urologic organs; and lung
WatchMate Software v1.2.0 processes transesophageal echocardiography data to reconstruct the left atrial appendage and assist preprocedural planning and device sizing during...
Guides medical professionals acquiring ten standard 2D transthoracic echocardiographic views in adults requiring a cardiac ultrasound examination; acquired images require...