FDA-cleared profile

Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS

Brainomix Limited

Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS is a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) software device used to assist the clinician in the assessment and characterization of brain tissue abnormalities using CT image data. The software automatically registers images and uses an atlas to segment and analyze ASPECTS regions. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS extracts image data from individual voxels in the image to provide analysis and computer analytics and relates the analysis to the atlas defined ASPECTS regions. The imaging features are then synthesized by an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT) score. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS is indicated for evaluation of patients presenting for diagnostic imaging workup for evaluation of extent of disease. Extent of disease refers to the number of ASPECTS regions affected which is reflected in the total score. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS provides information that may be useful in the characterization of ischemic brain tissue injury during image interpretation (within 24 hours from time last known well). Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS provides a comparative analysis to the ASPECTS standard of care radiologist assessment by providing highlighted ASPECTS regions and an automated editable ASPECTS score for clinician review. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS additionally provides a visualization of the voxels contributing to and excluded from the automated ASPECTS score, and a calculation of the voxel volume contributing to ASPECTS score.

Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.

Clinical fit

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS is a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) software device used to assist the clinician in the assessment and characterization of brain tissue abnormalities using CT image data. The software automatically registers images and uses an atlas to segment and analyze ASPECTS regions. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS extracts image data from individual voxels in the image to provide analysis and computer analytics and relates the analysis to the atlas defined ASPECTS regions. The imaging features are then synthesized by an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT) score. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS is indicated for evaluation of patients presenting for diagnostic imaging workup for evaluation of extent of disease. Extent of disease refers to the number of ASPECTS regions affected which is reflected in the total score. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS provides information that may be useful in the characterization of ischemic brain tissue injury during image interpretation (within 24 hours from time last known well). Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS provides a comparative analysis to the ASPECTS standard of care radiologist assessment by providing highlighted ASPECTS regions and an automated editable ASPECTS score for clinician review. Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS additionally provides a visualization of the voxels contributing to and excluded from the automated ASPECTS score, and a calculation of the voxel volume contributing to ASPECTS score.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Exact-submission indication text from the ACR AI Central model card. FDA labeling remains controlling.

Intended users
Neuroradiologist/Clinician
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Intended-user text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.

Care setting and population
Adult
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Patient-population text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; institutional setting may still require vendor confirmation.

Workflow role
Segmentation or contouring
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.

Required input
CT images or data. Inclusion criteria: DICOM compliant Non-contrast CT (NCCT) brain images from patients presenting for diagnostic imaging workup for suspected acute ischemic stroke; patients aged over 21 years; images acquired on Siemens Somatom Definition scanners; within 24 hours from time last known well
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.

Output and human action
The AI model outputs an automated ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT) score (0-10) reflecting the number of ASPECTS regions affected by ischemic injury. It provides highlighted ASPECTS regions overlaid on brain scan images, a voxel-wise heatmap visualizing voxels contributing to and excluded from the ASPECTS score, a calculation of the voxel volume contributing to the ASPECTS score, indication of affected side, and affected ASPECTS regions. The score is editable by the clinician.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Clinical output reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.

Limitations
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Confirm contraindications, unsupported populations, scanners, protocols, and known failure modes.

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K243294
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
CT/CTA
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Imaging modality reported in the exact-submission ACR AI Central model card.

Anatomy
Brain
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Anatomy normalized from explicit exact-submission ACR model-card wording.

Clearance type
510(k)
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2025-02-14
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
The exact-submission ACR model card explicitly references DICOM in the described input, output, or workflow; exact interfaces, versions, and local compatibility require confirmation.
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Interoperability terms explicitly reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; interface versions and local compatibility still require confirmation.

Deployment and data flow
On-premise
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

Deployment category preserved from the prior exact-submission review; hosting region, data flow, and current commercial configuration still require vendor confirmation.

Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

FDA authorization does not establish the current commercial security posture. Request data-flow diagrams, hosting and retention details, access controls, audit logging, attestations, and incident-response documentation.

Training and support
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

Training, onboarding, competency, and support commitments are commercial implementation details that require current vendor documentation.

Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.

Input or output interoperability

DICOM is explicitly referenced in the described input, output, or workflow.

exact submission · checked 2026-09-01

The model card does not establish every supported DICOM object, transfer method, or local interface.

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.

Evidence summary
Study type: Both. Cases: 137. Reported sensitivity: 69% (95% CI: 56%, 75%). Reported specificity: 97% (95% CI: 80%, 97%). Reader-study cases: 140. Readers: 7
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Structured study metadata from the exact-submission ACR model card; this is not an independent evidence synthesis.

Reported sensitivity
69% (95% CI: 56%, 75%)
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Model sensitivity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.

Reported specificity
97% (95% CI: 80%, 97%)
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Model specificity reported by ACR AI Central. Review endpoint, threshold, study population, and tested version before comparison.

No contextualized exact-version metric has completed evidence review. Regulatory-document values, when available, are shown above with their limitations.

Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS regulatory performance study summary

Stand-alone performance and reader study (ACR AI Central category) · Adult

exact submission · Tested version: Exact product version not reported; regulatory study summarized for FDA submission K243294 · n=137 · Independence not established

K243294

ACR AI Central summarizes the regulatory study; consult the exact FDA materials before comparative use.

Economics and lifecycle

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

FDA submission materials do not establish current commercial pricing. Request the pricing unit, term, minimum commitment, implementation fees, and included support from the vendor.

Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Determine whether any product-specific CPT/HCPCS pathway exists and separate it from billing for the underlying imaging service.

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Exact FDA record reviewedStatus
2026-09-04Last searched
19Fields reviewed
6Source classes checked
0Unreviewed PubMed leads
0Unreviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

Exact-submission ACR model-card fields were normalized under the current provenance rules; vendor and independent-study confirmation remain distinct. Automated exact-name discovery found 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records. Candidates require human product and version matching; zero candidates is not evidence that no studies exist. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads remain unpublished until a human confirms the exact product and tested version.

Source classes: fda ai list, fda decision summary, acr ai central product, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources

Source ledger

Sources accessed through 2026-09-02.

Alternatives

Related tools to compare