FDA-cleared profile

AI Platform 2.2 (AIP002)

Exo Imaging

Provides AI-assisted cardiac, lung and abdominal quality feedback and measurements; users remain responsible for scan quality and diagnosis and must not rely solely on the software.

Evidence status: each field shows source quality, applicability, and review date. Research pending, information not established in reviewed sources, and vendor documentation pending are distinct outcomes.

Clinical fit

What this tool is for

Start with the authorized purpose, then verify how it fits your service line and reading workflow.

Exact purpose
Provides AI-assisted cardiac, lung and abdominal quality feedback and measurements; users remain responsible for scan quality and diagnosis and must not rely solely on the software.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Intended users
Healthcare professionals trained and qualified to conduct echocardiography, abdominal, and lung ultrasound scans; certified healthcare professionals
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Intended-user text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card.

Care setting and population
Adult
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-01

Patient-population text reported in the exact-submission ACR model card; institutional setting may still require vendor confirmation.

Workflow role
Measurement or quantification
Public source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Conservative normalization of explicit wording in an exact-submission source.

Required input
Single- or multi-frame DICOM ultrasound images from software modules integrated into compatible ultrasound devices.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Output and human action
Lung A/B-line presence and count; cardiac LVEF, IVC and myocardial-wall measurements; image-quality feedback for cardiac, lung and added abdominal views.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Limitations
The added abdominal indication is outside the predicate PCCP; users must use clinical judgment and independently assess diagnostic adequacy.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Regulatory identity

FDA record and catalog context

The FDA listing establishes the regulatory identity. It does not by itself establish local workflow fit, pricing, security, or performance in your environment.

FDA submission
K260217
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Modality
Ultrasound
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Anatomy
Heart/Cardiovascular; Lung; Abdomen/Pelvis
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Clearance type
510(k)
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
Decision date
2026-02-24
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31
FDA status
FDA-cleared
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-31

Implementation

Questions for IT, informatics, and operations

Use these fields to structure a vendor demo, security review, and implementation estimate.

Integration
Current Exo Iris specifications describe DICOM worklist/store/send and PACS/VNA connectivity; EHR access requires Exo Works Enterprise, and worksheets/1 TB cloud storage require Connect.
Vendor supplied Product family Checked 2026-09-06

Package requirements are family-level and do not establish that every AIP002 deployment includes them.

Deployment and data flow
AI modules and APIs are integrated by the ultrasound-device programmer; current hosting details were not established.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Security and privacy
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact product version Checked 2026-09-06
Training and support
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact product version Checked 2026-09-05
Monitoring and change control
Vendor documentation pending
Vendor confirmation Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-08-13

Local acceptance testing, production monitoring, drift review, update control, and incident escalation require a current vendor and site-specific governance plan.

Family package caveats

EHR requires Works Enterprise; worksheets and 1 TB cloud storage require Connect.

product family · checked 2026-09-06

Evidence

Performance evidence

Metrics are shown only when they are tied to a source, endpoint, population, and tested product version.

Evidence summary
The FDA summary reports image-quality agreement in retrospective clip validation and real-time evaluation; no disease-detection sensitivity or specificity is reported.
FDA source Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Reported sensitivity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05
Reported specificity
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-05

Clip-level quality ICC

0.95 ICC

Abdominal image-quality agreement in 184 patients, 200 clips.

Tested version: AI Platform 2.2

AI Platform 2.2 abdominal quality validation

Retrospective clip validation with separate real-time usability evaluation. · 184 patients / 200 clips in retrospective validation; 186 real-time scans by 12 users in separate evaluation.

exact submission · Tested version: AI Platform 2.2 (AIP002) · n=184 · Independence not established

K260217

Economics and lifecycle

Budget and ongoing governance

These are common procurement questions; unknown values remain visible until a source supports them.

Pricing and total cost
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact product version Checked 2026-09-06
Reimbursement and coding
Research pending
Needs research Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-06

Safety and lifecycle

Postmarket record

Recall and adverse-event records are shown only after product matching. Adverse-event reports do not establish incidence or causality.

Postmarket safety review
Not established in reviewed sources
Reviewed sources checked Exact FDA submission Checked 2026-09-04

No native submission-identifier match was found in the checked openFDA radiology recall snapshot. Product-name, manufacturer, and adverse-event searches remain necessary; this does not establish that no recall or safety report exists.

Buyer worksheet

Open questions to take to the vendor

Open evaluation checklist

Research record

What has been checked

This audit distinguishes completed source review from fields that have not yet been researched.

Human reviewedStatus
2026-09-06Last searched
22Fields reviewed
9Source classes checked
0Reviewed PubMed leads
0Reviewed trial leads
0Unreviewed FDA recall leads

No stored literature or trial candidates; empty metadata snapshots were screened. The current discovery snapshot contains 0 PubMed and 0 ClinicalTrials.gov candidate records; its dated, count-matched human screening remains current. Unlinked candidates remain quarantined. Native FDA recall identifiers produced 0 postmarket candidate records; 0 have been reviewed (0 published, 0 rejected) and 0 remain unreviewed.

Candidate leads were screened against the exact product and tested version. Unlinked records remain quarantined.

Source classes: fda ai list, acr ai central product, fda decision summary, vendor technical page, literature index, trial registry, pubmed, clinical trials, openfda device recall

Sources

Source ledger

Sources accessed through 2026-09-06.

Alternatives

Related tools to compare

FDA-cleared K251368

FETOLY

Diagnoly

FETOLY analyzes fetal ultrasound images and sequences to detect labeled fetal brain and heart views, assess image completeness or quality, and provide fetal biometric measurements...

Modality
Ultrasound
Anatomy
Fetal heart and fetal brain
Decision
2025-09-12
FDA-cleared K250543

Voluson™ Performance 16; Voluson™ Performance 18

GE Medical Systems Ultrasound and Primary care Diagnostics

Voluson Performance 16 and 18 are general-purpose diagnostic ultrasound systems for imaging, measurement, display, and analysis of the human body and fluid across the labeled...

Modality
Ultrasound
Anatomy
Fetal, obstetric, abdominal, pelvic, pediatric, small-organ, cephalic, cardiac, vascular, musculoskeletal, lung, and urologic anatomy
Decision
2025-05-29